Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 27;10:598192. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598192

Table 6.

Relationship between BTG1 expression and clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer.

Clinicopathologicalfeatures n BTG1 expression
+ ++ +++ PR (%) P value
Age(years) 0.812
 <65 280 95 53 76 56 66.1
 ≥65 205 72 40 51 42 64.9
Sex 0.981
 Male 261 88 51 72 50 66.3
 Female 224 79 42 55 48 64.7
Depth of invasion <0.001
 Tis–T2 126 57 27 28 14 54.8
 T3–T4 338 104 62 93 79 69.2
Lymphatic invasion 0.146
 − 197 75 40 52 30 61.9
 + 207 71 36 55 45 65.7
Venous invasion 0.003
 − 195 78 42 47 28 60.0
 + 196 59 33 57 47 69.9
Lymph node metastasis 0.019
 − 259 97 53 65 44 62.5
 + 207 62 37 57 51 70.0
Liver metastasis 0.090
 − 450 158 88 117 87 64.9
 + 28 7 4 8 9 75.0
Distant metastasis 0.041
 − 445 158 85 116 86 64.5
 + 36 7 8 10 11 80.6
TNM staging 0.002
 0–II 247 95 53 60 39 61.5
 III–IV 215 62 37 60 56 71.2
Differentiation 0.193
 Well-differentiated 197 72 43 47 35 63.5
 Moderately differentiated 231 72 37 71 51 68.8
 Poorly differentiated 32 14 4 7 7 56.3

PR, positive rate; Tis, carcinoma in situ; T1, lamina propria and submucosa; T2, muscularis propria; T3, subserosa and exposure to serosa; T4, invade other organs or perforate visceral peritoneum; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.