Table 1.
Authors | Sample size | Design | Epitumoral lymphatic vessel density method | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shields et al. (7) | 21 | Retrospective | Complete • All lymphatics counted • x40 objective • 350 µm from tumor edge |
Index predicted metastasis more effectively than thickness alone |
Emmett et al. (4) | 102 | Retrospective | Complete and hotspot • x100 objective • Three areas of subjectively high density were counted and averaged |
Hotspot faster but comparable to complete method Shields index (81% specific, 82% sensitive) predicted metastasis more effectively than lymphatic vessel density and AJCC staging |
Spiric et al. (11) | 100 | Retrospective | Hotspot | Shields index (75% specific, 81.3% sensitive), performed better at predicting metastasis than thickness and AJCC staging |