Shivapurkar et al. (1995) [29] |
MUN-induced rat mammary cancer |
IP6 |
|
Vucenik et al. (1995) [30] |
DMBA-induced rat mammary cancer |
IP6; Ins; IP6 + Ins |
Significant reduction of tumor incidence in a group treated with: IP6 (p = 0.02), Ins (p < 0.05), or IP6 and Ins (p < 0.05) compared to controls
58% reduction of tumor multiplicity in IP6 + Ins group compared to controls (1.8 ± 0.1 versus 3.1 ± 0.3, respectively) (p < 0.05)
|
Shamsuddin et al. (1996) [32] |
Human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 |
IP6 |
Dose-dependent growth inhibition of both cell lines, suppression of DNA synthesis
Increased expression of lactalbumin (associated with luminal cell differentiation) up to 22-fold compared to controls
|
El-Sherbiny et al. (2001) [33] |
Human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 |
IP6 |
|
Tantivejkul et al. (2003) [34] |
Human breast cancer cell line: MDA-MB-231 |
IP6 |
65% reduction of cell adhesion of IP6-treated cells to fibronectin (p = 0.002), and 37% reduction of cell adhesion to collagen (p = 0.005)
Reduced number of migrating cells and the distance of cell migration (p < 0.001)
Absence of lamellipodia structure in IP6-treated cells (p = 0.001)
IP6 treatment inhibited MMP-9 secretion (p = 0.006)
|
Tantivejkul et al. (2003) [35] |
Human breast cancer cell line: MDA-MB-231 |
IP6 |
|
Tantivejkul et al. (2003) [37] |
MCF-7, MDA-MB 231 and adriamycin-resistant MCF-7 (MCF-7/Adr) human breast cell lines |
IP6 |
MCF-7/Adr was the most sensitive cell line for IP6 treatment (IC50 of 1.26 mM), while MCF-7 cell line was the least sensitive one (IC50 = 4.18 mM)
Synergism effect of growth suppression when IP6 was administered prior to adriamycin (especially against MCF-7 cells (p < 0.0001)
Synergism with tamoxifen in all three lines
|
Vucenik et al. (2005) [36] |
MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line |
IP6 |
3.1-fold increased expression of antiproliferative PKCδ (p = 0.0002)
Decrease in Erk1/2 and Akt activity (p < 0.05)
Increased p27Kip1 and marked reduction of pRb phosphorylation (p < 0.05)
|
Bačić et al. (2010) [39] |
Ductal invasive breast cancer during FEC chemotherapy protocol |
IP6 |
Patients treated with IP6 and Inositol had a significantly higher quality of life than patients from the placebo group, significantly higher functional score compared to the placebo group (87.9 versus 56.3; p = 0.0003), and lesser side symptoms (13.5 versus 33.8 on the symptomatic scale; p = 0.04)
No leukocyte or platelet drop in the IP6- and inositol-treated group (the drop in leukocytes and platelets was significant in the control group)
|
Pasta et al. (2015) [42] |
Mammographic breast density (premenopausal women) |
MI |
Significant reduction of breast density in the MI group compared to the placebo group (60% versus 9%), p < 0.001
Significant pain reduction after treatment in 13 out of 15 (86.7%) women with high breast density
|
Pasta et al. (2016) [44] |
Breast fibroadenomas |
MI |
Reduction of fibroadenoma median volume for 17.86% (p = 0.005) versus 5.96% in the placebo group (p = n.s.)
38.88% of patients from the MI arm had a reduction of fibroadenoma volume, compared to 17.85% in the placebo arm
No patients from the placebo or experimental arm showed signs of worsening
|
Dinicola et al. (2016) [38] |
Human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and ZR-75 |
Inositol |
Reduction of PI3K activity by 40% (p < 0.001) and phosphorylated Akt by 35% (p < 0.05) after Ins treatment, compared to controls
Ins treatment increased by 7-fold the level of E-cadherin (p < 0.001) and doubled the level of β-catenin (p < 0.01), compared to controls
Decreased SNAI1 expression after Ins treatment (p < 0.001)
Ins treatment reduced both motility (p < 0.001) and invasiveness (p < 0.05) of breast cancer cells
No detectable formation of lamellipodia and filopodia was observed in Ins-treated cells
Cytoskeleton stabilization in Ins-treated cells.
|
Proietti et al. (2017) [41] |
Ductal breast cancer stages II‒III postoperative (lumpectomy); during polychemotherapy CMF |
IP6 |
Significant reduction of chemotherapy side effects in IP6-treated group compared to controls (12 ± 10 versus 45.81 ± 10.0; p ≤ 0.001)
No leukocytes or platelets drop in the IP6-treated group (reduction of leukocytes and platelets was significant in the control group)
One-third the number of postponed chemotherapy cycles in the IP6-treated group compared to the control group
Significant improvement of quality of life in the IP6-treated group
Significant improvement of functional status in the IP6-treated group
|