Table 4.

Correlations between school-level rates of active transport to school, objectively measured BE features, and adolescents’ perceptions of school routes.

	School-Level Active Transport to School Rates	0.5 km Street-network Buffer				1.0 km Street-network Buffer
		Intersection Density	Residential Density	Land Use Mix	Walkability Index	Intersection Density	Residential Density	Land Use Mix	Walkability Index
School-level active transport to school rates		−0.61 **	−0.62 **	0.09 *	−0.69 ***	−0.58 ***	−0.60 **	0.07 *	−0.64 ***
Adolescents’ perceptions of route to school
There is too much traffic along the route	−0.82 ***	0.57 **	0.63 **	−0.07	0.69 ***	0.67 ***	0.70 ***	−0.02	0.77 ***
There are one or more dangerous crossings along the route	−0.08 ***	0.55 **	0.65 **	−0.05	0.71 ***	0.62 **	0.67 ***	−0.01	0.74 ***
Adolescents’ perceptions of walking to school
It is unsafe to walk to school	−0.76 ***	0.51 *	0.52 *	0.13	0.71 ***	0.49 *	0.55 **	0.20	0.71 ***
My parents think it is not safe to walk to school	−0.84 ***	0.46 *	0.48 *	0.22	0.71 ***	0.39	0.47 *	0.29	0.66 **
There are no footpaths along the way	0.20	−0.28	−0.37	0.29	−0.22	−0.32	−0.37	0.33	−0.21
Adolescents’ perceptions of cycling to school
It is unsafe to cycle to school	−0.78 ***	0.51 *	0.54 **	−0.11	0.57 **	0.55 **	0.58 **	−0.06	0.61 **
My parents think it is not safe to cycle to school	−0.82 ***	0.61 **	0.61 **	−0.10	0.69 ***	0.61 **	0.61 **	−0.08	0.65 **
There are no cycle paths along the way	−0.09	0.31	0.12	−0.05	0.23	0.16	−0.02	−0.15	−0.01

Data are reported as r (p-values as: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).