Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;17(1):e13009. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13009

TABLE 3.

Treatment effect of the Healthy Buddies™ curriculum by subgroups

Subgroup Outcome Healthy Buddies™ Standard curriculum Treatment effect a , b
Mean difference 95% CI Mean difference 95% CI Difference of mean differences 95% CI
Overall BMI z‐score 0.04 [−0.01, 0.10] −0.01 [−0.07, 0.04] 0.05 [−0.04, 0.15]
Waist circumference −0.71 [−1.39, −0.03] 0.97 [0.30, 1.63] −1.68 [−2.85, −0.51]**
Dietary intake 3.22 [0.96, 5.48] −1.39 [−3.72, 0.94] 4.61 [0.95, 8.27]*
Healthy living knowledge 6.71 [4.44, 8.99] 0.82 [−1.50, 3.13] 5.89 [2.30, 9.50]**
Self‐efficacy 5.93 [3.15, 8.71] 0.68 [−2.16, 3.52] 5.25 [0.99, 9.51]*
Higher income (Q3‐Q5) BMI z‐score 0.02 [−0.06, 0.11] −0.05 [−0.14, 0.03] 0.07 [−0.06, 0.21]
Waist circumference −1.27 [−2.28, −0.27] −0.38 [−0.63, 1.39] −1.65 [−3.36, 0.06]
Dietary intake 4.57 [1.04, 8.10] −2.24 [−5.73, 1.25] 6.81 [1.77, 11.83]**
Healthy living knowledge 9.25 [5.70, 12.80] 2.75 [−0.81, 6.32] 6.50 [1.20, 11.80]*
Self‐efficacy 6.05 [1.63, 10.47] 1.30 [−3.09, 5.70] 4.75 [−2.22, 11.71]
Lower income (Q1‐Q2) BMI z‐score 0.05 [−0.02, 0.12] 0.01 [−0.06, 0.09] 0.04 [−0.10, 0.18]
Waist circumference −0.35 [−1.25, 0.54] 1.38 [0.52, 2.23] −1.73 [−3.31, −0.14]*
Dietary intake 2.35 [−0.61, 5.32] −0.78 [−3.84, 2.29] 3.13 [−1.84, 8.11]
Healthy living knowledge 5.10 [2.20, 8.00] −0.52 [−3.51, 2.46] 5.62 [0.84, 10.40]*
Self‐efficacy 5.85 [2.27, 9.43] 0.25 [−3.49, 3.99] 5.60 [0.24, 10.96]*
Male BMI z‐score 0.01 [−0.07, 0.09] −0.01 [−0.09, 0.08] 0.02 [−0.11, 0.14]
Waist circumference −0.68 [−1.68, 0.31] 1.33 [0.37, 2.28] −2.01 [−3.55, −0.48]*
Dietary intake 2.52 [−0.06, 5.64] −1.84 [−4.96, 1.29] 4.36 [−0.48, 9.19]
Healthy living knowledge 7.14 [3.99, 10.29] −1.92 [−5.13, 1.30] 9.06 [4.36, 13.76]***
Self‐efficacy 7.06 [3.23, 10.90] −1.22 [−5.10, 2.67] 8.28 [3.31, 13.25]**
Female BMI z‐score 0.08 [0.00, 0.15] −0.03 [−0.10, 0.05] 0.11 [−0.06, 0.26]
Waist circumference −0.74 [−1.66, 0.19] 0.59 [−0.24, 1.51] −1.33 [−3.18, 0.54]
Dietary intake 3.98 [0.66, 7.29] −0.89 [−4.35, 2.56] 4.87 [−0.59, 10.33]
Healthy living knowledge 6.25 [3.00, 9.50] 3.70 [0.32, 7.08] 2.55 [−2.97, 8.07]
Self‐efficacy 4.69 [0.75, 8.62] 2.68 [−1.37, 6.73] 2.01 [−4.74, 8.75]
Urban BMI z‐score 0.06 [−0.02, 0.15] 0.04 [−0.03, 0.12] 0.02 [−0.12, 0.16]
Waist circumference 0.16 [−0.86, 1.18] 1.26 [0.40, 2.13] −1.10 [−2.69, 0.48]
Dietary intake 7.03 [3.56, 10.50] −3.43 [−6.37, −0.49] 10.46 [5.48, 15.44]***
Healthy living knowledge 7.35 [4.00, 10.70] −2.40 [−5.44, 0.64] 9.75 [4.47, 15.03]***
Self‐efficacy 6.23 [2.03, 10.43] −0.49 [−4.23, 3.26] 6.72 [0.75, 12.69]*
Rural BMI z‐score 0.02 [−0.05, 0.10] −0.09 [−0.17, 0.00] 0.11 [−0.04, 0.26]
Waist circumference −1.39 [−2.25, −0.53] 0.59 [−0.40, 1.58] −1.98 [−3.69, −0.27]*
Dietary intake 0.20 [−2.79, 3.18] 1.31 [−2.34, 4.96] −1.11 [−6.43, 4.20]
Healthy living knowledge 6.21 [3.22, 9.21] 4.89 [1.52, 8.25] 1.32 [−3.55, 6.20]
Self‐efficacy 5.69 [2.02, 9.36] 2.16 [−2.13, 6.45] 3.53 [−2.80, 9.87]

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.

a

Results are adjusted for age, sex, income and geography.

b

The effect of the Healthy Buddies™ curriculum is calculated as the difference in mean differences between pre‐ and post‐intervention means in each subgroup. For example, in the higher income group, dietary intake increased by an average of 4.57 points in the Healthy Buddies™ arm and decreased by an average of 2.24 points in the standard curriculum arm. The difference between these two mean differences is 6.81).

*

P < 0.05.

**

P < 0.01.

***

P < 0.001.