Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 10;10:21736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78426-8

Table 1.

Characteristics of reviewed studies on the association of vegan or vegetarian diet with inflammatory biomarkers.

Study characteristics Diet group characteristics Studied SQS
Vegetarians Vegans Omnivores biomarkers
Mezzano et al. (1999)17
Country Chile n (n = 26) (n = 26) CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 47.0 ± 12.7c 39.5 ± 12.2c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 52) BMIb 23.0 ± 3.3ci 23.0 ± 3.3ci
Male % (n) 46.1% (n = 24) Durationa  ≥ 1
Šebeková et al. (2001)18
Country Slovak Republic n (n = 19) (n = 9) (n = 19) CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 36.1 ± 2.5d 36.6 ± 3.0d 30.5 ± 1.6d
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 61) BMIb 22.0 ± 0.05d 20.6 ± 0.8d 23.8 ± 0.04d
Male % (n) 38% (n = 23) Durationa 8.2 ± 0.8c 7.2 ± 1.0c
Szeto et al. (2004)19
Country China n (n = 30) (n = 30) CRP 3
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 44.2 ± 9.0c 44.0 ± 9.2c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 60) BMIb NR NR
Male % (n) 10% (n = 6) Durationa 21.8 ± 12.2c
Krajcovicova-Kudlackova et al. (2005)20
Country Slovak Republic n (n = 133) (n = 137) hs-CRP 6
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 46.2 ± 1.4d 47.2 ± 1.4d
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 270) BMIb 22.9 ± 0.2e 24.7 ± 0.3e
Male % (n) 35.5% (n = 96) Durationa 10.4 ± 0.4c
Šebeková et al. (2006)21
Country Slovak Republic n (n = 90) (n = 46) hs-CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 37.7 (35.1–40.3)f 37.7 (33.5–40.7)f
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 136) BMIb 22.7 (22.1–23.3)f 23.8 (22.7–24.9)f
Male % (n) 36% (n = 49) Durationa 2–25
Chen et al. (2008)22
Country Taiwan n (n = 99) (n = 99) hs-CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 51.2 ± 8.9c 49.4 ± 9.6c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 198) BMIb 22.9 ± 2.8c 23.8 ± 3.6c
Male % (n) 43.9% (n = 87) Durationa  ≥ 1
Hung et al. (2008)23
Country Taiwan n (n = 71) (n = 388) CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 49.1 ± 11.2c 50.6 ± 9.5c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy or metabolic syndrome (n = 459) BMIb 22.6 ± 2.7c 23.9 ± 3.1c
Male % (n) 57.7% (n = 265) Durationa NR
Chen et al. (2011)24
Country Taiwan n (n = 173) (n = 190) hs-CRP 6
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 54.0 ± 9.7c 49.9 ± 9.8c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 363) BMIb 22.9 ± 2.9c 23.3 ± 3.5c
Male % (n) 0% (n = 0) Durationa ≥ 1
Su et al. (2011)25
Country Taiwan n (n = 49) (n = 41) hs-CRP 3
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 58.6 ± 6.0c 57.2 ± 5.4c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 90) BMIb 23.2 ± 2.7c 23.1 ± 2.9c
Male % (n) 0% (n = 0) Durationa 10.8 ± 7.5c
Wu et al. (2011)26
Country Taiwan n (n = 19) (n = 299) hs-CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 63.3 ± 2.6c 57.5 ± 1.2c
Study population (n) Haemodialysis patients (n = 318) BMIb 22.7 ± 0.3c 20.2 ± 0.8c
Male % (n) 46.9% (n = 149) Durationa NR
Lee et al. (2014)27
Country Republic of Korea n (n = 357) (n = 357) hs-CRP 6
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 52.8 ± 8.5c 53.8 ± 8.7c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy or metabolic syndrome (n = 714) BMIb 24.9 ± 2.9c 23.7 ± 3.3c
Male % (n) 42.9% (n = 306) Durationa NR
Montalcini et al. (2015)28
Country Italy n (n = 26) (n = 26) IL-6 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 32.6 ± 8.4c 30.5 ± 6.7c TNF-α
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 52) BMIb 21.9 ± 2.0c 21.8 ± 2.0c MCP-1
Male % (n) 50% (n = 26) Durationa  ≥ 3
Chuang et al. (2016)29
Country Taiwan n (n = 686) (n = 3423) CRP 7
Study design Cross-sectionalh Agea 42.2 ± 12.3c 45.1 ± 12.2c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 4109) BMIb 22.1 ± 3.1c 22.9 ± 3.2c
Male % (n) 27.1% (n = 1115) Durationa  ≥ 3
Kandouz et al. (2016)30
Country United Kingdom n (n = 16) (n = 122) CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 71.7 ± 11.6c 63.7 ± 16.9c
Study population (n) Kidney failure (n = 138) BMIb 25.4 ± 5.2c 26.5 ± 6.0c
Male % (n) 63.9% (n = 88) Durationa early adult hood
Lee et al. (2016)31
Country Taiwan n (n = 54) (n = 100) hs-CRP 4
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 65.1 ± 11.3c 57.7 ± 10.5c IL-6
Study population (n) Type 2 diabetes (n = 154) BMIb 24.9 ± 6.2c 26.5 ± 5.7c
Male % (n) 41.5% (n = 64) Durationa  ≥ 1
Ou et al. (2016)32
Country Taiwan n (n = 21) (n = 42) hs-CRP 4
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 56.2 ± 13.7c 56.3 ± 11.7c
Study population (n) Dialysis Patients (n = 63) BMIb 20.4 ± 2.1c 22.5 ± 3.4c
Male % (n) 22.6% (n = 12) Durationa  ≥ 1.5
Acosta-Navarro et al. (2017)33
Country Brazil n (n = 44) (n = 44) hs-CRP 6
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 45.5 ± 7.8c 46.8 ± 9.6c
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 88) BMIb 23.1 ± 2.9c 27.2 ± 4.8c
Male % (n) 100% (n = 88) Durationa 17.8 ± 12.5c
Franco-De-Moraes et al. (2017)34
Country Brazil n (n = 102) (n = 66) (n = 100) CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 49.6 ± 8.6c 49.6 ± 8.5c 49.1 ± 8.2c E-selectin
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 268) BMIb 24.2 ± 3.9c 23.2 ± 4.1c 26.4 ± 4.7c TNF-α
Male % (n) 45.8% (n = 123) Durationa  ≥ 1  ≥ 1
Tseng et al. (2018)35
Country Taiwan n (n = 15) (n = 140) hs-CRP 5
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 63.2 ± 2.5c 58.5 ± 1.3c
Study population (n) Haemodialysis patients (n = 155) BMIb 20.2 ± 0.5c 22.4 ± 0.2c
Male % (n) 45.1% (n = 70) Durationa NR
Ganie et al. (2019)36
Country India n (n = 179) (n = 141) hs-CRP 7
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 26.5 ± 6.0c 26.6 ± 4.1c IL-6
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 320) BMIb 24.0 ± 4.2c 24.0 ± 3.6c TNF-α
Male % (n) 0% (n = 0) Durationa NR Adiponectin
Study population (n) PCOS (n = 144) n (n = 82) (n = 62) Resistin
Male % (n) 0% (n = 0) Agea 25.7 ± 3.8c 26.1 ± 4.4c
BMIb 24.9 ± 3.6c 24.6 ± 3.5c
Durationa NR
Menzel et al.(2020) 37
Country Germany n (n = 36) (n = 36) hs-CRP 6
Study design Cross-sectional Agea 37.5 (32.5–44.0)g 38.5 (32.0–46.0)g IL-18
Study population (n) Apparently healthy (n = 72) BMIb 22.9 ± 3.2c 24.0 ± 2.1c IL-1 RA
Male % (n) 50% (n = 36) Durationa 4.8 (3.1–8.7)g ICAM-1
Adiponectin
Omentin-1
Resistin

aReported in years; b reported in kg/m2; cexpressed as mean ± SD; dmean ± SE; emean ± SEM; f mean (95%-CI); g median (IQR); h using baseline values; i mean across both diet groups; SQS: Study Quality Score (using Newcastle—Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies); NR: not reported.