Table 2.
Previous studies on the visual and refractive outcomes of implantable collamer lens (ICL) extraction.
| Author | Year | Eyes | Model | Prevalence | F/U (years) | UDVA | CDVA | Within 0.5 D (%) | Within 1.0 D (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanders et al.7 | 2002 | 48 | V4 | 1.3% | 1.4 ± 0.6 | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A |
| Bleckmann et al.8 | 2005 | 14 | V4 | 7.1% | 2.6 ± 0.9 | N.A | N.A | 66% | 100% |
| Morales et al.9 | 2006 | 12 | V4 | 3.8% | > 0.5 | 0.40 ± 0.27 | 0.27 ± 0.21 | N.A | 71.4% |
| Kamiya et al.10 | 2010 | 10 | V2,3,4 | N.A | 7.8 ± 2.8 | 0.26 ± 0.30 | − 0.06 ± 0.07 | 80% | 90% |
| Gimbel et al.11 | 2018 | 46 | V4 | 2.7% | 2 to 14 | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A |
| Current | 2020 | 8 | V4c, 5 | 1.0% | 2.2 ± 1.9 | − 0.03 ± 0.37 | − 0.27 ± 0.06 | 88% | 100% |
F/U follow up, UDVA uncorrected distance visual acuity, CDVA corrected distance visual acuity, D diopter, N.A. not available.