Table 2.

Effects of footwear (CV vs. ML vs. BF), walking condition (NW vs. DTW) and footwear * walking condition on the MoS metrics of walking stability (n = 28).

MoS metric	Parameter	Estimate	SE	df	Sig	95% CI lower bound	95% CI upper bound
MoS AP	Footwear (CV vs. ML)	− 0.020	0.002	136	< 0.001	− 0.026	− 0.014
	Footwear (BF vs. ML)	− 0.027	0.003	140	< 0.001	− 0.034	− 0.020
	Footwear (BF vs. CV)	− 0.007	0.004	149	0.163	− 0.002	0.015
	Walking condition (NW vs. DTW)	0.001	0.002	133	0.899	− 0.006	0.007
	Footwear (CV vs. ML) * Walking	0.002	0.004	126	0.521	− 0.005	0.011
	Footwear (BF vs. ML) * Walking	− 0.003	0.004	126	0.390	− 0.013	0.005
	Footwear (BF vs. CV) * Walking	− 0.002	0.003	126	0.478	− 0.012	0.006
	Speed	− 0.356	0.021	148	< 0.001	− 0.398	− 0.315
	Cadence	− 0.003	0.001	152	< 0.001	− 0.004	− 0.002
MoS ML	Footwear (CV vs. ML)	− 0.001	0.001	140	0.254	− 0.005	0.001
	Footwear (BF vs. ML)	0.001	0.001	142	0.319	− 0.001	0.004
	Footwear (BF vs CV)	0.003	0.001	148	0.134	− 0.001	0.006
	Walking condition (NW vs. DTW)	− 0.001	0.001	140	0.486	− 0.004	0.002
	Footwear (CV vs. ML) * Walking	0.001	0.002	140	0.526	− 0.003	0.005
	Footwear (BF vs. ML) * Walking	− 0.001	0.002	140	0.846	− 0.004	0.004
	Footwear (BF vs. CV) * Walking	− 0.001	0.002	140	0.788	− 0.004	0.005
	Speed	− 0.0169	0.007	167	0.033	− 0.032	− 0.001

CV conventional shoes, ML minimal shoes, BF barefoot, NW normal walking, DTW dual-task walking, MoS margin of stability, AP anterior–posterior, ML medio-lateral, SE standard error, df degree of freedom, sig. p value, CI confidence interval.