Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020 May;29(3):286–292. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000595

The varying roles of macrophages in kidney injury and repair

Yi Wen 1, Steven D Crowley 1
PMCID: PMC7731284  NIHMSID: NIHMS1651309  PMID: 32235271

Abstract

Purpose of review:

Macrophages play an important role in regulating homeostasis, kidney injury, repair, and tissue fibrogenesis. This review will discuss recent advances that explore the novel subsets and functions of macrophage in the pathogenesis of kidney damage and hypertension.

Recent Findings:

Macrophages differentiate into a variety of subsets in microenvironment-dependent manner. While the M1/M2 nomenclature is still applied in considering the pro- versus anti-inflammatory effects of macrophages in kidney injury, novel and accurate macrophage phenotypes are defined by flow cytometric markers and single-Cell RNA signatures. Studies exploring the crosstalk between macrophages and other cells are rapidly advancing with the additional recognition of exosome trafficking between cells. Using murine conditional mutants, actions of macrophage can be defined more precisely than in bone marrow transfer models. Some studies revealed the opposing effects of the same protein in renal parenchymal cells and macrophages, highlighting a need for the development of cell-specific immune therapies for translation.

Summary:

Macrophage-targeted therapies hold potential for limiting kidney injury and hypertension. To realize this potential, future studies will be required to understand precise mechanisms in macrophage polarization, crosstalk, proliferation, and maturation in the setting of renal disease.

Keywords: Macrophage, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, hypertension

Introduction

Macrophages are prototypical cells from the innate immune system, that were originally identified by their capacity for phagocytosis[1]. However, macrophages are multifunctional and perform diverse roles by integrating endocrine/paracrine signals or ligand-receptor signals in the local tissue environment[25]. In the kidney, the macrophages have been divided into infiltrating “bone marrow-derived macrophages” and long-lived “tissue-resident macrophages”[69]. The macrophages can either aggravate kidney injury by stimulating inflammation or perform a protective role by facilitating tissue repair[1013]. Several groups have elucidated the role of macrophages in regulating the progression of kidney fibrosis, a final common pathway of chronic kidney disease (CKD) leading to end-stage renal disease (ESRD)[1416]. Pro-inflammatory macrophages can exacerbate blood pressure elevation and target organ damage in hypertension[1719], whereas VEGF-C-positive macrophages limit salt-sensitive hypertensive responses by preventing interstitial sodium accumulation [20]. In this review, we highlight advances in understanding in the roles of macrophages in acute kidney injury (AKI), CKD, and hypertension, focusing on the regulation of macrophage phenotype, surface marker expression, and the crosstalk between macrophages and kidney parenchymal cells or other immune cells.

Macrophage origin and polarization

Following the initial discovery of macrophages as a subset of bone marrow-derived phagocytic cells[1], lineage tracing techniques divided macrophages into two subsets based on their origin: embryonic-derived resident macrophages or bone marrow-derived infiltrating macrophages[2123]. These two populations have diverse roles in maintaining homeostasis, responses to injury, and tissue repair. Embryonic macrophages are hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-derived cells in the yolk sac, which contribute to the innate immune functions, red blood cell maturation, and development of fetal architecture[24]. Embryonic macrophages also migrate to various organs during development and mature into tissue-resident macrophages in the brain, heart, and liver. However, the kidney-resident macrophages are fetal monocyte-derived FLT3 negative macrophages but not yolk sac-derived[25]. In response to initial injury, resident macrophages sense damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), leading to augmented phagocytosis, antigen processing and presentation, and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines[26]. Bone marrow-derived monocytes are then recruited into injured tissues and mature into monocyte-derived macrophages, resulting in augmented inflammatory responses.

Another classification of macrophages defines them as M1 (classically activated) or M2 (alternatively activated). In vitro experiments revealed that LPS and IFN-γ stimulation facilitates M1 polarization and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, whereas interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) administration leads to M2 polarization and anti-inflammatory cytokine production[27]. Although the definition of M1/M2 macrophage provided a simplified paradigm through which to study the phenotype and function of macrophages in vitro, the in vivo environment is more complex and dynamic, and clearly polarized M1 or M2 phenotypes are not uniformly observed in tissues during disease [28]. For example, a recent clinical study identified more than nine different types of macrophage polarization [29]. Thus, the M1/M2 paradigm has limitations in explaining the phenotype of a mixed subset of macrophages that show plasticity. Studies using single-cell RNA-Seq have highlighted macrophage phenotype changes that are inconsistent with the M1/M2 paradigm and revealed novel macrophage populations in vivo [30, 31]. While we employ the M1/M2 paradigm in some parts of this review for simplicity, we acknowledge that a more complex subset description may be necessary in certain disease settings.

Macrophages in acute kidney injury

Macrophages are involved in both the injury and repair phase of ischemic AKI, and the actions of macrophages are phenotype dependent[32, 33]. Lee et al.[34] found that the recruitment of iNOS-positive pro-inflammatory macrophages is dramatically increased within the first 48 hours after ischemic AKI, whereas renal macrophages in the later phases of AKI are mannose receptor and arginase 1 (Arg1) positive non-inflammatory macrophages. Within 24 hours after experimental AKI, circulating Ly6Chigh monocytes migrate to the inflamed site of kidney via the Chemokine Receptor (CCR2) and CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1)[3537]. Mincle is a transmembrane pattern recognition receptor that is detected in CD68+iNOS+ M1 macrophages and is essential for the maintenance of M1 phenotype[38]. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) as an extracellularly released nuclear factor can stimulate macrophage recruitment at day 5 after ischemic AKI[39]. During the maturation of these Ly6Chigh monocytes, the polarization towards a pro-inflammatory (M1) phenotype is strengthened and enforced by pro-inflammatory cytokines and DAMPs[4042]. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) in proximal tubular cells also exacerbates M1 polarization highlighting the reciprocal effects of renal parenchymal tissues on infiltrating macrophage phenotype during ischemic AKI. Exosomes deliver messages between cells via their packaged molecules. Tubular epithelial cell-derived exosomal RNA and microRNAs stimulate M1 macrophage responses and kidney injury during AKI[4345]. Macrophage depletion prior to ischemic AKI protects against renal functional decline and tubular injury, whereas adoptive transfer of IFN-γ-induced M1 macrophages to macrophage deficient mice restores kidney injury after ischemic AKI[34, 46]. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) as an M1 cytokine can stimulates kidney injury and inflammation through IL-1 receptor. Compared to the wide-type (WT) controls, the total numbers of CD64+ macrophages were similar in the kidneys of IL-1 receptor knock out (IL1R KO) mice during cisplatin AKI, whereas the total numbers of CD11b+TNF+ macrophages in IL1R KO kidneys was reduced[47], indicating that IL-1R activation may exaggerate cisplatin nephrotoxicity by promoting TNF generation in myeloid cells. While pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophages can remove DAMPs and dead cells, the prolonged activation of pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophages leads to extensive inflammation and delayed tissue repair.

Anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages are essential for the proliferation and regeneration of damaged epithelial cells and are increased at day 3 after ischemic AKI[34, 48, 49]. Baek et al.[50] found a phenotype conversion from Ly6GF4/80+NOS-2+TNFα+ (M1 like) to Ly6GF4/80+Arginase-1+Dectin-1+CD206+ (M2 like) macrophages at the later phase after ischemic AKI. M2-like macrophages exhibit beneficial effects after ischemic AKI, such as clearance of intraluminal debris, promotion of epithelial regeneration, activation of regulatory T cells, and attenuation of kidney inflammation[33, 5153]. Ly6Cintermediate macrophages facilitate kidney injury repair, whereas Ly6Clow macrophages promote kidney fibrosis in the long term after ischemic AKI[37, 54]. Stimulating mineralocorticoid receptors on myeloid cells inhibits the polarization of macrophage toward M2 phenotype, thereby promoting the AKI to CKD transition[55]. F4/80hiFcgr4hiFcgr1+ macrophages are newly defined kidney resident macrophages distinct from infiltrating monocytes[56]. These kidney resident macrophages display a unique signature inconsistent with either M1 or M2 paradigm and promote tissue repair by activating the wingless-type MMTV integration site family (Wnt) pathway[56, 57].

Macrophages in chronic kidney disease

Bone marrow-derived monocytes are precursors to the macrophages that accumulate in the injured kidney and proliferate locally during chronic kidney injury[5860]. Accordingly, blockade of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) significantly inhibits monocyte proliferation in the bone marrow, which limits renal macrophage accumulation and attenuates kidney injury during nephrotoxic nephritis (NTN) and kidney allograft rejection[10, 61]. CCL2 mediates the migration of bone marrow-derived monocyte to the injured kidney, such that CCL2 blockade attenuates glomerular and interstitial infiltration of pro-inflammatory macrophages[6264]. Other chemokines such as CX3CL1, CXCL16, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) also contribute to renal macrophage recruitment in kidney disease[6568]. Complements and deposited immunoglobulin can stimulate macrophage recruitment and activation through a fragment receptor (FcR)-dependent manner[69, 70], but may not be required for vascular monocyte-driven autoimmune damage to the kidney[71]. By contrast, we found that the mononuclear cell chemokine C-C motif chemokine 5 (CCL5) constrains CCL2 expression, macrophage infiltration, and kidney damage and fibrosis in hypertension via blood pressure-independent mechanisms, emphasizing a complex network of overlapping chemokines[19].

Recruited macrophages then produce a range of cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), which in turn exacerbate M1 polarization and CKD[16, 72, 73]. Renal parenchyma-derived DAMPs such as DNA, high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1), and C-reactive protein also augment the renal accumulation of pro-inflammatory macrophages and aggravate kidney injury in several CKD models [7478]. As direct evidence of M1 macrophage contributions to CKD pathogenesis, the adoptive transfer of M1 polarized macrophages exacerbates glomerular and interstitial injury in CKD[73, 79]. Inversely, blockade M1 macrophage signaling pathways attenuates kidney injury[8082]. In some renal diseases, the macrophage is not a major source of TNF-α that injures the kidney[83]. However, in an autoimmune nephritis model, we found that CD11b+Ly6Chi macrophage-derived TNF-α stimulates kidney injury and interstitial fibrosis by inducing epithelial necroptosis[16]. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation generally stimulates tissue injury and inflammation. For example, activating the type 1 angiotensin receptor (AT1R) in renal parenchymal cells drives kidney injury, blood pressure elevation, and cardiac hypertrophy[84, 85]. By contrast, in our hands, AT1R activation on T lymphocytes blunts Th1 responses and reduces pro-inflammatory macrophage differentiation[86]. Similarly, stimulating the AT1R on myeloid cells attenuates M1 pro-inflammatory cytokine production, leading to reduced kidney injury and fibrosis in rodent models of kidney injury induced by hypertension, obstruction, and obesity[8789].

Anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages are recruited in the chronic phase of the disease, leading to kidney repair and/or fibrosis. Clinical studies have revealed a correlation between renal accumulation of CD163+ (M2) macrophages and the severity of kidney fibrosis in patients with immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, type 2 diabetes, or chronic kidney allograft injury[9093]. Similarly, M2 macrophages promote glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis in rodent models of NTN[94, 95]. Adoptive transfer of splenic macrophages pre-conditioned with IL-10/TGF-β protect against kidney injury in adriamycin nephrosis[96, 97]. Macrophage-derived matrix metallopeptidases also regulate matrix deposition and degradation in renal disease[98, 99]. For example, our studies revealed that Twist1 in CD11b+Ly6Clow macrophages decreases matrix accumulation in in obstructed kidneys by promoting MMP13 production[15]. By contrast, Twist1 in the distal nephron but not infiltrating macrophages stimulates kidney inflammation and fibrosis during aristolochic acid nephropathy, showing that the actions of macrophage Twist1 in CKD pathogenesis is context-dependent[100]. Wnt / b-catenin signaling plays a key role in renal fibrogenesis, and we previously reported that blocking Wnt secretion by disrupting the catalytic activity of the Wnt-acyl transferase Porcupine ameliorates fibrosis in the obstructed kidney[101]. However, deleting Porcupine selectively from myeloid cells exaggerates kidney scar formation and renal inflammation[102]. Thus, in selected injury models, macrophage-derived Twist1 and Porcupine both play renoprotective roles in contrast to their pathogenic actions within injured kidney tubular cells.

Macrophages in hypertension

Angiotensin (Ang) II regulates blood pressure levels and natriuresis via the AT1R activation on renal parenchymal cells[84]. Ang II also regulates the differentiation and infiltration of pro-inflammatory monocyte/macrophages in the hypertensive kidney[87, 103, 104]. Bone marrow-derived monocytes accumulate in the vascular wall and kidney to exacerbate n RAS-induced hypertension[17, 105]. Hypertensive patients have increased numbers of pro-inflammatory monocytes and elevated levels of cytokines in the circulation[106, 107]. Inversely, deleting monocytes and macrophages in mice limits blood pressure elevation and vascular damages during chronic Ang II infusion, whereas adoptive transfer of wild type monocytes restores the Ang II-induced hypertensive response and target organ damage[17, 108]. In contrast to the protective effects of global AT1 receptor (AT1R) blockade, we have found previously that AT1R deletion on myeloid populations can aggravate target organ damage during hypertension, highlighting a protective effect of AT1R activation on immune cells[85, 109, 110]. In salt-sensitive hypertension, high salt concentrations facilitate macrophages polarization toward a pro-inflammatory (M1) phenotype and blunts IL-4/IL-13-induced anti-inflammatory (M2) differentiation[111113]. In the spontaneously hypertensive rat, CD161a+CD68+ pro-inflammatory macrophages infiltrate the renal medulla and exacerbate hypertensive responses[114]. However, the phenotype of macrophages is not static during the evolution of hypertension. Moore et al.[115] found that a shift from M1 to the M2 phenotype occurs at the 7–14 days after Ang II infusion with consequent increases in tissue fibrosis.

Infiltrating pro-inflammatory macrophages can regulate blood pressure by producing a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β. Renal parenchyma-derived TNF-α exacerbates blood pressure levels and causes targets organ damage by impairing nitric oxide production[116, 117]. Similarly, IL-1β stimulates hypertensive responses and kidney damage through IL-1 receptor activation [87, 118]. In our hands, IL-1 receptor activation suppressed the maturation of NO-expressing Ly6C+Ly6G macrophages with consequent inhibition of the NKCC2 sodium cotransporter[119]. Macrophages can also regulate hypertensive end-organ damage via blood pressure-independent mechanisms. Accordingly, deficiency in CCR2 or colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) reduces renal macrophage recruitment and both kidney and vascular damage in Ang II-induced hypertension[120122].

Nevertheless, the role of macrophages in hypertension is also tissue-dependent, as dermal macrophages attenuate sodium retention and salt-sensitive hypertension by stimulating lymphangiogenesis[20]. The transcription factor tonicity-responsive enhancer-binding protein (TONEBP) in kidney macrophages also facilitates NOS2-dependent NO production leading to increased vasodilation and sodium excretion[111, 119]. Similarly, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) in skin macrophages stimulates M2 polarization and inhibits salt-sensitive hypertension via vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C)- dependent lymphangiogenesis[123]. Finally, endothelin-1 (ET-1) mediates vasoconstriction via receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells, but, endothelin-B receptor (ETBR) deficiency on myeloid cells also attenuates blood pressure elevation and endothelial dysfunction without impacting macrophage polarization in Ang II-induced hypertension[124].

Conclusions

Monocytes/macrophages are recruited and activated by diverse chemokines and play a critical role in renal injury, repair, and fibrosis. Although the simplified pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophage paradigm has been widely used, macrophages also regulate the process of wound repair, pro-/anti-fibrogenesis, and tissue regeneration through complex phenotypes than the simple, dichotomous paradigm. Moreover, differentiation of macrophages shows plasticity during renal disease pathogenesis, leading researchers to explore new combinations of surface markers to distinguish macrophage subpopulation. Several proteins including AT1R, Twist1, and Porcupine on renal parenchymal and myeloid cells serve opposing functions during CKD and hypertension. Thus, targeting macrophages to limit kidney injury and blood pressure elevation will require incisive and cell-directed strategies.

Thus, therapies targeting the macrophage in renal disease will require a clearer understanding of macrophage functions at each stage of injury or repair. Several questions linger: How does the microenvironment in injured kidneys impact macrophage phenotype? What are the key mechanisms regulating macrophage phenotype switching? How can a stable, therapeutic macrophage phenotype be established following renal injury? What are the mechanisms controlling the self-renewal of kidney resident macrophage? What is the nature of the crosstalk between resident and infiltrating macrophages following a kidney insult? Finally, how can new tools such as single-Cell RNA sequencing be harnessed to identify and promote healthful macrophage subpopulations in the injured kidney? Future studies will address these and other key questions to shape innate immune responses that can and limit renal damage and fibrosis and drive kidney repair.

Key points.

Macrophages are critical in maintaining kidney health and in instigating both kidney damage and repair.

The macrophage phenotype depends on the renal microenvironment and changes in different phases of kidney disease.

Macrophages have a wide range of phenotypes beyond M1 and M2.

Signaling pathways in macrophages and renal parenchymal cells may exhibit opposite effects during the pathogenesis of kidney disease.

Funding:

NIH grants DK118019 and HL128355; US Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development grant BX000893, American Heart Association (AHA) Predoctoral Fellowship 18PRE34030402.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

▪ of special interest

▪▪ of outstanding interest

  • 1.Cline MJ, Warner NL, Metcalf D. Identification of the bone marrow colony mononuclear phagocyte as a macrophage. Blood 1972; 39:327–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lavin Y, Winter D, Blecher-Gonen R et al. Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell 2014; 159:1312–1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weidenbusch M, Anders HJ. Tissue microenvironments define and get reinforced by macrophage phenotypes in homeostasis or during inflammation, repair and fibrosis. J Innate Immun 2012; 4:463–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muller S, Kohanbash G, Liu SJ et al. Single-cell profiling of human gliomas reveals macrophage ontogeny as a basis for regional differences in macrophage activation in the tumor microenvironment. Genome Biol 2017; 18:234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wynn TA, Chawla A, Pollard JW. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature 2013; 496:445–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kawakami T, Lichtnekert J, Thompson LJ et al. Resident renal mononuclear phagocytes comprise five discrete populations with distinct phenotypes and functions. J Immunol 2013; 191:3358–3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Munro DAD, Hughes J. The Origins and Functions of Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Kidney Development. Front Physiol 2017; 8:837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Cortie K, Russell NS, Coppes RP et al. Bone marrow-derived macrophages incorporate into the endothelium and influence vascular and renal function after irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 2014; 90:769–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jang HS, Kim JI, Jung KJ et al. Bone marrow-derived cells play a major role in kidney fibrosis via proliferation and differentiation in the infiltrated site. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1832:817–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Han Y, Ma FY, Tesch GH et al. c-fms blockade reverses glomerular macrophage infiltration and halts development of crescentic anti-GBM glomerulonephritis in the rat. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 2011; 91:978–991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lech M, Grobmayr R, Ryu M et al. Macrophage phenotype controls long-term AKI outcomes--kidney regeneration versus atrophy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25:292–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ma R, Jiang W, Li Z et al. Intrarenal macrophage infiltration induced by T cells is associated with podocyte injury in lupus nephritis patients. Lupus 2016; 25:1577–1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wise AF, Williams TM, Kiewiet MB et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells alter macrophage phenotype and promote regeneration via homing to the kidney following ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2014; 306:F1222–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang YY, Jiang H, Pan J et al. Macrophage-to-Myofibroblast Transition Contributes to Interstitial Fibrosis in Chronic Renal Allograft Injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 28:2053–2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15▪.Ren J, Zhang J, Rudemiller NP et al. Twist1 in Infiltrating Macrophages Attenuates Kidney Fibrosis via Matrix Metallopeptidase 13-Mediated Matrix Degradation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:1674–1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Dr. Ren found that Twist1 in CD11b+Ly6Clow macrophages decreases matrix accumulation in obstructed kidneys by promoting MMP13 production.
  • 16▪.Wen Y, Lu X, Ren J et al. KLF4 in Macrophages Attenuates TNFalpha-Mediated Kidney Injury and Fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:1925–1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Dr. Wen found that CD11b+Ly6Chi macrophage-derived TNF-α augments kidney injury and interstitial fibrosis by inducing epithelial necroptosis
  • 17.Wenzel P, Knorr M, Kossmann S et al. Lysozyme M-positive monocytes mediate angiotensin II-induced arterial hypertension and vascular dysfunction. Circulation 2011; 124:1370–1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Elmarakby AA, Quigley JE, Olearczyk JJ et al. Chemokine receptor 2b inhibition provides renal protection in angiotensin II - salt hypertension. Hypertension 2007; 50:1069–1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rudemiller NP, Patel MB, Zhang JD et al. C-C Motif Chemokine 5 Attenuates Angiotensin II-Dependent Kidney Injury by Limiting Renal Macrophage Infiltration. Am J Pathol 2016; 186:2846–2856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Machnik A, Neuhofer W, Jantsch J et al. Macrophages regulate salt-dependent volume and blood pressure by a vascular endothelial growth factor-C-dependent buffering mechanism. Nat Med 2009; 15:545–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schulz C, Gomez Perdiguero E, Chorro L et al. A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science 2012; 336:86–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 2010; 330:841–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hashimoto D, Chow A, Noizat C et al. Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity 2013; 38:792–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Davidson AJ, Zon LI. The ‘definitive’ (and ‘primitive’) guide to zebrafish hematopoiesis. Oncogene 2004; 23:7233–7246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Beaudin AE et al. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity 2014; 40:91–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vannella KM, Wynn TA. Mechanisms of Organ Injury and Repair by Macrophages. Annual review of physiology 2017; 79:593–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mills CD. M1 and M2 Macrophages: Oracles of Health and Disease. Critical reviews in immunology 2012; 32:463–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Avraham R, Haseley N, Brown D et al. Pathogen Cell-to-Cell Variability Drives Heterogeneity in Host Immune Responses. Cell 2015; 162:1309–1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xue J, Schmidt SV, Sander J et al. Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation. Immunity 2014; 40:274–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reyfman PA, Walter JM, Joshi N et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Lung Provides Insights into the Pathobiology of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 199:1517–1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31▪▪.Zimmerman KA, Bentley MR, Lever JM et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Identifies Candidate Renal Resident Macrophage Gene Expression Signatures across Species. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:767–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study highlighted macrophage phenotype changes that are inconsistent with the M1/M2 paradigm and revealed novel macrophage populations in vivo.
  • 32.Huen SC, Cantley LG. Macrophages in Renal Injury and Repair. Annual Review of Physiology, Vol 79 2017; 79:449–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen TT, Cao Q, Wang YP, Harris DCH. M2 macrophages in kidney disease: biology, therapies, and perspectives. Kidney International 2019; 95:760–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee S, Huen S, Nishio H et al. Distinct macrophage phenotypes contribute to kidney injury and repair. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22:317–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang MZ, Yao B, Yang S et al. CSF-1 signaling mediates recovery from acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest 2012; 122:4519–4532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li L, Huang L, Sung SS et al. The chemokine receptors CCR2 and CX3CR1 mediate monocyte/macrophage trafficking in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int 2008; 74:1526–1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang Q, Wang Y, Pei G et al. Bone marrow-derived Ly6C(−) macrophages promote ischemia-induced chronic kidney disease. Cell Death Dis 2019; 10:291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lv LL, Tang PM, Li CJ et al. The pattern recognition receptor, Mincle, is essential for maintaining the M1 macrophage phenotype in acute renal inflammation. Kidney Int 2017; 91:587–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu HL, Ma J, Wang P et al. HMGB1 Contributes to Kidney Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2010; 21:1878–1890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schaefer L, Babelova A, Kiss E et al. The matrix component biglycan is proinflammatory and signals through Toll-like receptors 4 and 2 in macrophages. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2005; 115:2223–2233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anders HJ, Ryu M. Renal microenvironments and macrophage phenotypes determine progression or resolution of renal inflammation and fibrosis. Kidney Int 2011; 80:915–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Takeuchi O, Sato S, Horiuchi T et al. Cutting edge: role of Toll-like receptor 1 in mediating immune response to microbial lipoproteins. J Immunol 2002; 169:10–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43▪▪.Lv LL, Feng Y, Wen Y et al. Exosomal CCL2 from Tubular Epithelial Cells Is Critical for Albumin-Induced Tubulointerstitial Inflammation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:919–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study found that CCL2 RNA from kidney tubule-derived exosomes stimulates macrophage activation and recruitment into injured kidney.
  • 44▪.Lv LL, Feng Y, Wu M et al. Exosomal miRNA-19b-3p of tubular epithelial cells promotes M1 macrophage activation in kidney injury. Cell Death Differ 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study highlighted the potential of exosomal microRNAs in delivering messages between macrophages and renal parenchymal cells.
  • 45.Li ZL, Lv LL, Tang TT et al. HIF-1alpha inducing exosomal microRNA-23a expression mediates the cross-talk between tubular epithelial cells and macrophages in tubulointerstitial inflammation. Kidney Int 2019; 95:388–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Klinkert K, Whelan D, Clover AJP et al. Selective M2 Macrophage Depletion Leads to Prolonged Inflammation in Surgical Wounds. Eur Surg Res 2017; 58:109–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Privratsky JR, Zhang J, Lu X et al. Interleukin 1 receptor (IL-1R1) activation exacerbates toxin-induced acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2018; 315:F682–F691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Roszer T Understanding the Mysterious M2 Macrophage through Activation Markers and Effector Mechanisms. Mediators Inflamm 2015; 2015:816460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Saha S, Aranda E, Hayakawa Y et al. Macrophage-derived extracellular vesicle-packaged WNTs rescue intestinal stem cells and enhance survival after radiation injury. Nat Commun 2016; 7:13096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Baek JH, Zeng R, Weinmann-Menke J et al. IL-34 mediates acute kidney injury and worsens subsequent chronic kidney disease. J Clin Invest 2015; 125:3198–3214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lin SL, Li B, Rao S et al. Macrophage Wnt7b is critical for kidney repair and regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:4194–4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sola A, Weigert A, Jung M et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate signalling induces the production of Lcn-2 by macrophages to promote kidney regeneration. J Pathol 2011; 225:597–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Arai S, Kitada K, Yamazaki T et al. Apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage protein enhances intraluminal debris clearance and ameliorates acute kidney injury in mice. Nat Med 2016; 22:183–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lin SL, Castano AP, Nowlin BT et al. Bone marrow Ly6Chigh monocytes are selectively recruited to injured kidney and differentiate into functionally distinct populations. J Immunol 2009; 183:6733–6743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Barrera-Chimal J, Estrela GR, Lechner SM et al. The myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor controls inflammatory and fibrotic responses after renal injury via macrophage interleukin-4 receptor signaling. Kidney Int 2018; 93:1344–1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lever JM, Hull TD, Boddu R et al. Resident macrophages reprogram toward a developmental state after acute kidney injury. Jci Insight 2019; 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mass E, Ballesteros I, Farlik M et al. Specification of tissue-resident macrophages during organogenesis. Science 2016; 353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jose MD, David JR, Atkins RC, Chadban SJ. Blockade of macrophage migration inhibitory factor does not prevent acute renal allograft rejection. Am J Transplant 2003; 3:1099–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Le Meur Y, Tesch GH, Hill PA et al. Macrophage accumulation at a site of renal inflammation is dependent on the M-CSF/c-fms pathway. J Leukoc Biol 2002; 72:530–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lim AK, Ma FY, Nikolic-Paterson DJ et al. Antibody blockade of c-fms suppresses the progression of inflammation and injury in early diabetic nephropathy in obese db/db mice. Diabetologia 2009; 52:1669–1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ma FY, Woodman N, Mulley WR et al. Macrophages contribute to cellular but not humoral mechanisms of acute rejection in rat renal allografts. Transplantation 2013; 96:949–957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Awad AS, Kinsey GR, Khutsishvili K et al. Monocyte/macrophage chemokine receptor CCR2 mediates diabetic renal injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011; 301:F1358–1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Clauss S, Gross O, Kulkarni O et al. Ccl2/Mcp-1 blockade reduces glomerular and interstitial macrophages but does not ameliorate renal pathology in collagen4A3-deficient mice with autosomal recessive Alport nephropathy. J Pathol 2009; 218:40–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Haller H, Bertram A, Nadrowitz F, Menne J. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and the kidney. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension 2016; 25:42–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Segerer S, Hughes E, Hudkins KL et al. Expression of the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) in human kidney diseases. Kidney Int 2002; 62:488–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen L, Zhou X, Fan LX et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor promotes cyst growth in polycystic kidney disease. J Clin Invest 2015; 125:2399–2412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ma Z, Jin X, He L, Wang Y. CXCL16 regulates renal injury and fibrosis in experimental renal artery stenosis. American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2016; 311:H815–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Garcia GE, Truong LD, Li P et al. Inhibition of CXCL16 attenuates inflammatory and progressive phases of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody-associated glomerulonephritis. Am J Pathol 2007; 170:1485–1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Alexander JJ, Chaves L, Chang A, Quigg RJ. The C5a receptor has a key role in immune complex glomerulonephritis in complement factor H-deficient mice. Kidney Int 2012; 82:961–968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lopez-Parra V, Mallavia B, Lopez-Franco O et al. Fcgamma receptor deficiency attenuates diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23:1518–1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71▪▪.Kuriakose J, Redecke V, Guy C et al. Patrolling monocytes promote the pathogenesis of early lupus-like glomerulonephritis. J Clin Invest 2019; 129:2251–2265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study demonstrated that recruitment of patrolling monocytes is mediated by TLRs but not immune complexes in early lupus-like glomerulonephritis.
  • 72.Awad AS, You H, Gao T et al. Macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediates diabetic renal injury. Kidney Int 2015; 88:722–733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ikezumi Y, Atkins RC, Nikolic-Paterson DJ. Interferon-gamma augments acute macrophage-mediated renal injury via a glucocorticoid-sensitive mechanism. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:888–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Komada T, Chung H, Lau A et al. Macrophage Uptake of Necrotic Cell DNA Activates the AIM2 Inflammasome to Regulate a Proinflammatory Phenotype in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:1165–1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tian S, Zhang L, Tang J et al. HMGB1 exacerbates renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis through facilitating M1 macrophage phenotype at the early stage of obstructive injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2015; 308:F69–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chen X, Ma J, Kwan T et al. Blockade of HMGB1 Attenuates Diabetic Nephropathy in Mice. Scientific reports 2018; 8:8319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.You YK, Huang XR, Chen HY et al. C-Reactive Protein Promotes Diabetic Kidney Disease in db/db Mice via the CD32b-Smad3-mTOR signaling Pathway. Scientific reports 2016; 6:26740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu F, Chen HY, Huang XR et al. C-reactive protein promotes diabetic kidney disease in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2011; 54:2713–2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang Y, Wang YP, Zheng G et al. Ex vivo programmed macrophages ameliorate experimental chronic inflammatory renal disease. Kidney Int 2007; 72:290–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wilson HM, Chettibi S, Jobin C et al. Inhibition of macrophage nuclear factor-kappaB leads to a dominant anti-inflammatory phenotype that attenuates glomerular inflammation in vivo. Am J Pathol 2005; 167:27–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ikezumi Y, Hurst L, Atkins RC, Nikolic-Paterson DJ. Macrophage-mediated renal injury is dependent on signaling via the JNK pathway. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:1775–1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Arnold CE, Whyte CS, Gordon P et al. A critical role for suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 in promoting M1 macrophage activation and function in vitro and in vivo. Immunology 2014; 141:96–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Timoshanko JR, Sedgwick JD, Holdsworth SR, Tipping PG. Intrinsic renal cells are the major source of tumor necrosis factor contributing to renal injury in murine crescentic glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:1785–1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Crowley SD, Gurley SB, Herrera MJ et al. Angiotensin II causes hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy through its receptors in the kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:17985–17990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Crowley SD, Zhang J, Herrera M et al. Role of AT(1) receptor-mediated salt retention in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011; 301:F1124–1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86▪.Wen Y, Rudemiller NP, Zhang J et al. Stimulating Type 1 Angiotensin Receptors on T Lymphocytes Attenuates Renal Fibrosis. Am J Pathol 2019; 189:981–988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Dr. Wen found that AT1R activation on T lymphocytes reduces pro-inflammatory macrophage differentiation, showing the potential crosstalk inside immune system during renal fibrogenesis.
  • 87.Zhang JD, Patel MB, Griffiths R et al. Type 1 angiotensin receptors on macrophages ameliorate IL-1 receptor-mediated kidney fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2014; 124:2198–2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nishida M, Fujinaka H, Matsusaka T et al. Absence of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in bone marrow-derived cells is detrimental in the evolution of renal fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2002; 110:1859–1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ma LJ, Corsa BA, Zhou J et al. Angiotensin type 1 receptor modulates macrophage polarization and renal injury in obesity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011; 300:F1203–1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Eardley KS, Zehnder D, Quinkler M et al. The relationship between albuminuria, MCP-1/CCL2, and interstitial macrophages in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International 2006; 69:1189–1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Klessens CQF, Zandbergen M, Wolterbeek R et al. Macrophages in diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2017; 32:1322–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ikezumi Y, Suzuki T, Yamada T et al. Alternatively activated macrophages in the pathogenesis of chronic kidney allograft injury. Pediatr Nephrol 2015; 30:1007–1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ikezumi Y, Suzuki T, Karasawa T et al. Identification of alternatively activated macrophages in new-onset paediatric and adult immunoglobulin A nephropathy: potential role in mesangial matrix expansion. Histopathology 2011; 58:198–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Feng Y, Ren J, Gui Y et al. Wnt/beta-Catenin-Promoted Macrophage Alternative Activation Contributes to Kidney Fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:182–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Han Y, Ma FY, Tesch GH et al. Role of macrophages in the fibrotic phase of rat crescentic glomerulonephritis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2013; 304:F1043–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cao Q, Wang Y, Zheng D et al. IL-10/TGF-beta-modified macrophages induce regulatory T cells and protect against adriamycin nephrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:933–942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Cao Q, Wang Y, Zheng D et al. Failed renoprotection by alternatively activated bone marrow macrophages is due to a proliferation-dependent phenotype switch in vivo. Kidney Int 2014; 85:794–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Du X, Shimizu A, Masuda Y et al. Involvement of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in the development of renal interstitial fibrosis in mouse obstructive nephropathy. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 2012; 92:1149–1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tan TK, Zheng G, Hsu TT et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 of tubular and macrophage origin contributes to the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis via macrophage recruitment through osteopontin cleavage. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 2013; 93:434–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100▪.Ren J, Rudemiller NP, Wen Y et al. The transcription factor Twist1 in the distal nephron but not in macrophages propagates aristolochic acid nephropathy. Kidney Int 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Dr. Ren found that Twist1 in the distal nephron but not infiltrating macrophages stimulates kidney inflammation and fibrosis during AAN, showing that the actions of macrophage Twist1 in CKD pathogenesis are context- and cell-dependent
  • 101.Madan B, Patel MB, Zhang J et al. Experimental inhibition of porcupine-mediated Wnt O-acylation attenuates kidney fibrosis. Kidney Int 2016; 89:1062–1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102▪.Lu X, Rudemiller NP, Ren J et al. Opposing actions of renal tubular- and myeloid-derived porcupine in obstruction-induced kidney fibrosis. Kidney Int 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Dr. Lu established that myeloid-derived Porcupine is renoprotective in contrast to its pathogenic actions in injured renal tubular cells.
  • 103.Kim S, Zingler M, Harrison JK et al. Angiotensin II Regulation of Proliferation, Differentiation, and Engraftment of Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Hypertension 2016; 67:574–584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Gomolak JR, Didion SP. Angiotensin II-induced endothelial dysfunction is temporally linked with increases in interleukin-6 and vascular macrophage accumulation. Front Physiol 2014; 5:396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ozawa Y, Kobori H, Suzaki Y, Navar LG. Sustained renal interstitial macrophage infiltration following chronic angiotensin II infusions. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2007; 292:F330–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Parissis JT, Korovesis S, Giazitzoglou E et al. Plasma profiles of peripheral monocyte-related inflammatory markers in patients with arterial hypertension. Correlations with plasma endothelin-1. International journal of cardiology 2002; 83:13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Madej A, Okopien B, Kowalski J et al. Plasma concentrations of adhesion molecules and chemokines in patients with essential hypertension. Pharmacological reports : PR 2005; 57:878–881. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kossmann S, Hu H, Steven S et al. Inflammatory monocytes determine endothelial nitric-oxide synthase uncoupling and nitro-oxidative stress induced by angiotensin II. The Journal of biological chemistry 2014; 289:27540–27550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Crowley SD, Song YS, Sprung G et al. A role for angiotensin II type 1 receptors on bone marrow-derived cells in the pathogenesis of angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Hypertension 2010; 55:99–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhang JD, Patel MB, Song YS et al. A novel role for type 1 angiotensin receptors on T lymphocytes to limit target organ damage in hypertension. Circ Res 2012; 110:1604–1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Jantsch J, Schatz V, Friedrich D et al. Cutaneous Na+ storage strengthens the antimicrobial barrier function of the skin and boosts macrophage-driven host defense. Cell metabolism 2015; 21:493–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Binger KJ, Gebhardt M, Heinig M et al. High salt reduces the activation of IL-4- and IL-13-stimulated macrophages. J Clin Invest 2015; 125:4223–4238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Zhang WC, Zheng XJ, Du LJ et al. High salt primes a specific activation state of macrophages, M(Na). Cell research 2015; 25:893–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Harwani SC, Ratcliff J, Sutterwala FS et al. Nicotine Mediates CD161a+ Renal Macrophage Infiltration and Premature Hypertension in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat. Circ Res 2016; 119:1101–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Moore JP, Vinh A, Tuck KL et al. M2 macrophage accumulation in the aortic wall during angiotensin II infusion in mice is associated with fibrosis, elastin loss, and elevated blood pressure. American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2015; 309:H906–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sriramula S, Haque M, Majid DS, Francis J. Involvement of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in angiotensin II-mediated effects on salt appetite, hypertension, and cardiac hypertrophy. Hypertension 2008; 51:1345–1351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Zhang J, Patel MB, Griffiths R et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha produced in the kidney contributes to angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Hypertension 2014; 64:1275–1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang Y, Li Y, Wu Y et al. 5TNF-alpha and IL-1beta neutralization ameliorates angiotensin II-induced cardiac damage in male mice. Endocrinology 2014; 155:2677–2687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zhang J, Rudemiller NP, Patel MB et al. Interleukin-1 Receptor Activation Potentiates Salt Reabsorption in Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension via the NKCC2 Co-transporter in the Nephron. Cell metabolism 2016; 23:360–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Liao TD, Yang XP, Liu YH et al. Role of inflammation in the development of renal damage and dysfunction in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension 2008; 52:256–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.De Ciuceis C, Amiri F, Brassard P et al. Reduced vascular remodeling, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress in resistance arteries of angiotensin II-infused macrophage colony-stimulating factor-deficient mice: evidence for a role in inflammation in angiotensin-induced vascular injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25:2106–2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Florentin J, Coppin E, Vasamsetti SB et al. Inflammatory Macrophage Expansion in Pulmonary Hypertension Depends upon Mobilization of Blood-Borne Monocytes. J Immunol 2018; 200:3612–3625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Zhang MZ, Yao B, Wang Y et al. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 in hematopoietic cells results in salt-sensitive hypertension. J Clin Invest 2015; 125:4281–4294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124▪▪.Czopek A, Moorhouse R, Guyonnet L et al. A novel role for myeloid endothelin-B receptors in hypertension. Eur Heart J 2019; 40:768–784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study found endothelin-B receptors on myeloid cells inhibits endothelial dysfunction and hypertensive responses without impacting macrophage polarization.

RESOURCES