Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 31;1(2):101–109. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2019.01012

Table 6. Surgical indication, long-term outcomes, and prognostic factors reported in the previous and present studies.

Author Year n Surgical indication Median OS
(month)
5-year
RFS rate (%)
5-year OS
rate (%)
Prognostic factors
for poor survival
Shildberg et al. 2012 31 Without other distal metastasis NS NS 13 Multiple liver metastases
R1/R2 resection
Synchronous
Takemura et al. 2012 64 Three or fewer GELMs
(More liver metastases at the surgeon's discretion)
Only R0 resection
34 27 37 ≥ 5 cm in size
pT4 of primary tumor
Wang et al. 2012 30 Without other distal metastasis preoperatively
Synchronous GELMs
Only R0 resection
11 NS 16.7 Peritoneal dissemination
Multiple distal metastases
Kinoshita et al. 2014 256† Three or fewer GELMs
(More liver metastases at the surgeon's discretion)
Only R0 resection
31 30.1 31.1 pT4 of primary tumor
≥ 5 cm in size
≥ 3 GELMs
Tiberio et al. 2014 53† Without other distal metastasis 34 NS 31.5 ≥ 6 cm in size
D2 dissection
Wang et al. 2014 39 Without other distal metastasis 14 7.7 10.3 Lymph node metastasis
Multiple distal metastases
Guner et al. 2015 68† Not stated in detail (case by case) 24 26.0 30.0 ≥ 3 cm in size
Liu et al. 2015 35 Without other distal metastasis 33 NS 14.3 Lymphovascular invasion
Multiple liver metastasis
Oki et al. 2015 94† Without other distal metastasis 34 27.7 42.3 ≥ 3 cm in size
Multiple GELMs
≥ N2 of primary tumor
Present study 2018 31 Three or fewer GELMs
Controllable after chemotherapy
Only R0 resection
38 31.3 42.2 Diffuse/other type
R1/R2 resection

Abbreviations: OS, overall survivals; RFS, recurrence-free survivals; GELM, gastric/esophagogastric-junction liver metastasis; NS, not stated. †, Multicenter cohort study.