Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;8:e10458. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10458

Table 1. The clinic-pathological significance of PLK1 in cervical cancer.

Clinico-pathological variables High PLK1 expression Low PLK1 expression χ2 P
Number of cases % Number of cases %
Tissue type 11.108 0.001
Cervical cancer 179 61.7 111 38.3
Non-cancer 2 15.4 11 84.6
Subtype
CESC 145 64.2% 81 35.8% 2.889* 0.089
Cervical adenocarcinoma 33 52.4% 30 47.6%
Malignant mullerian mixed tumor 1 100% 0 0%
Age 0.656 0.418
≤44 88 59.5 60 40.5
>44 91 64.1 51 35.9
FIGO stage 1.862 0.172
I+II 99 66.4 50 33.6
III 67 58.3 48 41.7
T stage 1.89 0.169
T1+T2 175 61.2 111 38.8
T3+T4 3 100.0 0 0.0
N stage 29.859 <0.001
N0 112 52.3 102 47.7
N1-2 66 88.0 9 12.0

Notes.

FIGO: Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Chi-square test was used for comparing PLK1 protein expression in different clinical parameter groups.

*

Comparison of PLK1 protein expression in different subtypes of cervical cancer was made between CESC and cervical adenocarcinoma.