Table 1. The clinic-pathological significance of PLK1 in cervical cancer.
Clinico-pathological variables | High PLK1 expression | Low PLK1 expression | χ2 | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of cases % | Number of cases % | |||||
Tissue type | 11.108 | 0.001 | ||||
Cervical cancer | 179 | 61.7 | 111 | 38.3 | ||
Non-cancer | 2 | 15.4 | 11 | 84.6 | ||
Subtype | ||||||
CESC | 145 | 64.2% | 81 | 35.8% | 2.889* | 0.089 |
Cervical adenocarcinoma | 33 | 52.4% | 30 | 47.6% | ||
Malignant mullerian mixed tumor | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | ||
Age | 0.656 | 0.418 | ||||
≤44 | 88 | 59.5 | 60 | 40.5 | ||
>44 | 91 | 64.1 | 51 | 35.9 | ||
FIGO stage | 1.862 | 0.172 | ||||
I+II | 99 | 66.4 | 50 | 33.6 | ||
III | 67 | 58.3 | 48 | 41.7 | ||
T stage | 1.89 | 0.169 | ||||
T1+T2 | 175 | 61.2 | 111 | 38.8 | ||
T3+T4 | 3 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
N stage | 29.859 | <0.001 | ||||
N0 | 112 | 52.3 | 102 | 47.7 | ||
N1-2 | 66 | 88.0 | 9 | 12.0 |
Notes.
FIGO: Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Chi-square test was used for comparing PLK1 protein expression in different clinical parameter groups.
Comparison of PLK1 protein expression in different subtypes of cervical cancer was made between CESC and cervical adenocarcinoma.