Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec;9(4):145–153. doi: 10.22099/mbrc.2020.37181.1500

Table 2.

The selected 12 mRNA fold changes and the comparisons of LF vs. DMSO and PRP vs. SHAM groups at 3, 7, and 14 days

LF vs. DMSO
DMSO vs. SHAM
Day 3 Day 7 Day 14 Day 3 Day 7 Day 14
FC
(Mean±SD)
FC
(Mean±SD)
FC
(Mean±SD)
FC
(Mean±SD)
FC
(Mean±SD)
FC
(Mean±SD)
p p p p p p
Angpt1 2.707±0.469 0.985±0.197 0.401±0.061 36.100 ±6.618 71.146 ±12.814 4.032±0.661
0.036 0.871 0.008 0.002 0.002 0.431
Col1a1 5.573±0.891 0.719±0.135 0.063±0.011 7864.288 ±1496.398 1723.487±275.940 737.185±141.278
0.143 0.877 0.007 0.002 0.002 0.002
Col3a1 0.898±0.152 0.419±0.079 0.653±0.117 100.469 ±16.059 11.269±1.801 1.148±0.218
0.435 0.038 0.142 0.002 0.144 0.877
Ctgf -16.391±3.277 -142.853 ±22.857 -62.016 ±11.007 5.968±1.004 1.597±0.256 0.050±0.009
0.007 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.876 0.005
Cxcl11 -568.181 ±108.527 -26775.092 ±5167.389 -1374.462 ±230.832 -19.609±3.009 -27.783±4.439 -704.225 ±135.213
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.008 0.002
Cxcl15 -794.759 ±129.723 -10879.423±1951.628 -1725.927 ±323.362 -66.239±12.823 -120.106±20.872 -1994.457±342.562
0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002
Egfr -7727.877±1491.542 -10306.633 ±1850.298 -36238.319 ±6486.604 -138.435±23.976 -2047.465±421.838 -11048.203±2010.289
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001
IL10 -174.655 ±33.009 -1626.852 ±317.074 -1776.433 ±341.588 -1.967±0.393 -30.986±5.484 -2981.850±533.752
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.149 0.002 0.001
Mmp1 -6.774±1.327 -514.941±85.480 -119.158 ±20.894 8.060±1.141 5.518±0.855 0.030±0.006
0.009 0.002 0.002 0.030 0.144 0.037
Mmp7 -13.131±2.405 -1195.943 ±233.633 -322.913 ±62.43 2.864±0.514 2.302±0.412 0.023±0.004
0.006 0.001 0.002 0.147 0.147 0.003
Tgfa -21.432±3.486 -2580.530 ±402.480 -2792.531 ±67.173 0.476±0.092 1.200±0.213 -363.160±61.502
0.005 0.001 0.001 0.436 0.870 0.002
Tgfb1 -80.795 ±14.358 -2088.964 ±396.511 -22.551±3.936 0.330±0.056 -75.570±1.277 -565.641±100.522
0.002 0.001 0.002 0.022 0.002 0.002

Fold Change values ((FC)=2-ΔΔCt) were obtained from triplicate measurement, p values were determined using the ΔCt of both groups. The statistically significance was accepted for fivefold FC (FC<(2-5 =0.031), or FC>(25=32)), and p<0.0042. Up- and down-regulated genes were indicated in bold, statistically significant p values were presented in bold italic.