Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0243632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243632

Table 6. Antioxidant activity of extracts, their derived fractions and the compounds isolated from D. bulbifera, as evaluated by DPPH and hydroxyl radical scavenging.

No Sample IC50 (μM)
DPPH radical Hydroxyl Radical
1c EtOH extract 34.14 ± 0.68* 79.00 ± 0.78*
2c Water extract 13.20 ± 0.77* >100
3c CHCl3 fraction 13.35 ± 0.37* >100
4c EtOAc fraction 14.00 ± 0.36* 37.04 ± 0.50*
5c Water fraction 18.83 ± 0.46* 39.31 ± 0.42*
6 8-Epidiosbulbin E acetate (1) 80.87 ± 0.48* >100
7 15,16-Epoxy-6α-O-acetyl-8β-hydroxy-19-nor-clero-13(16),14-diene-17,12;18,2-diolide (2) 37.57 ± 1.27* 51.90 ± 0.62*
8 Sitosterol-β-D-glucoside (3) >100 >100
9 3,5-Dimethoxyquercetin (4) 9.02 ± 0.56* 22.07 ± 0.94*
10 (+)-Catechin (5) 8.27 ± 0.44* 19.58 ± 0.27*
11 Quercetin (6) 5.33 ± 0.25 16.80 ± 0.33*
12 Kaempferol (7) 16.15 ± 0.25* 51.68 ± 0.53*
13 Allantoin (8) >100 >100
14 2,4,3',5'-Tetrahydroxybibenzyl (9) 16.20 ± 0.27* 63.84 ± 0.54*
15 2,4,6,7-Tetrahydroxy-9,10 dihydrophenanthrene (10) 22.68 ± 0.54* 71.55 ± 1.12*
16 Myricetin (11) 4.87 ± 0.41 11.68 ± 0.39*
17 L-Ascorbic acid (positive control) 3.99 ± 0.13 ND
18 BHT (positive control) ND 4.06 ± 0.41

*Statistically significant difference between the positive control and sample, p < 0.05 (mean ± S.E.M. of three determinations).

cConcentration of treated samples and IC50 expressed in μg/ml.

ND = not determined.