Table 3.

Quality Assessment of Included Case Series

	Martin et al,32 2006	Henderson et al,25 1991	Geile et al,24 2019	Algren et al,20 2013	Lee et al,30 2016	Denton et al,22 2008	Jones et al,26 2008	Mercado et al,33 2014	Krinsky et al,28 2011
Were there clear criteria for inclusion in the case series?	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✖	✔	–
Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants included in the case series?	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔
Were valid methods used for identification of the condition for all participants included in the case series?	✔	✔	✔	✖	✔	✔	✖	✔	✔
Did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants?	✔	✖	✔	✔	✔	✔	✖	✔	–
Did the case series have complete inclusion of participants?	✔	✖	✔	–	✔	✔	✖	✔	✖
Was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the study?	✖	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔
Was there clear reporting of clinical information of the participants?	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	–	✖	✔	✖
Were the outcomes or follow up results of cases clearly reported?	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Was there clear reporting of the presenting site(s)/clinic(s) demographic information?	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔
Was statistical analysis appropriate?	–	–	–	✔	–	–	–	✔	–