Table 2.
Variablesb | Categories/Value | Odds Ratio | Odds Ratio 95% CI | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCL | UCL | ||||
Patient Characteristics | |||||
Sex | Female | 1.11 | 0.79 | 1.56 | 0.53 |
Male (ref) | |||||
Age, years | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.03 | 0.84 | |
Race/ethnicity | Black | 1.46 | 0.87 | 2.44 | 0.15 |
Hispanic | 1.19 | 0.75 | 1.88 | 0.46 | |
Asian/Pacific Islander | 1.73 | 0.85 | 3.53 | 0.13 | |
Native American | 2.33 | 0.25 | 22.02 | 0.46 | |
Other | 1.29 | 0.61 | 2.74 | 0.50 | |
White (ref) | |||||
Payer (%) | Medicaid | 0.80 | 0.54 | 1.18 | 0.26 |
Uninsured | 0.37 | 0.08 | 1.61 | 0.19 | |
Other | 0.46 | 0.19 | 1.12 | 0.09 | |
Private insurance (ref) | |||||
Number of comorbid chronic conditions | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
Weekend admission | Weekend Sat-Sun | 1.37 | 0.96 | 1.96 | 0.09 |
Weekday Mon-Fri (ref) | |||||
Hospital Characteristics | |||||
State | California | 2.26 | 1.34 | 3.82 | 0.002 |
Florida | 3.33 | 1.95 | 5.70 | <0.001 | |
Massachusetts | 2.87 | 1.35 | 6.09 | 0.006 | |
New York (ref) | |||||
Type of hospital ownership | Private, non-profit | 1.39 | 0.81 | 2.38 | 0.23 |
Private, for-profit | 0.81 | 0.24 | 2.79 | 0.74 | |
Public (ref) | |||||
Children’s hospital | Yes | 1.22 | 0.73 | 2.05 | 0.45 |
No (ref) | |||||
Teaching hospital | Yes | 0.81 | 0.41 | 1.58 | 0.53 |
No (ref) | |||||
Has fully implemented electronic records | Yes | 0.91 | 0.62 | 1.35 | 0.64 |
No (ref) | |||||
Has a pediatric ED | Yes | 1.20 | 0.72 | 2.00 | 0.49 |
No (ref) | |||||
Has a pediatric intensive care unit | Yes | 0.85 | 0.42 | 1.76 | 0.67 |
No (ref) | |||||
Total number of ED visits in a year | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
CI - confidence interval, ED - emergency department, LCL - lower confidence limit, UCL - upper confidence limit, ref - reference category for categorical variables
Generalized linear mixed models with random effects at the hospital level were constructed.
Multiple imputation was used to address missing data (final n=1922). Twenty-three records were missing all hospital-level variables and were dropped from this analysis.