Table 3.
Quality assessment of observational studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale
| Wychowansky et al. 2020 [11] | Yuce et al. 2019 [12] | Nord et al. 2019 [23] | Giesenhagen et al. 2019 [20] | Chandra et al. 2019 [10] | Sindel et al. 2018 [27] | Giraddi et al. 2017 [21] | Rizzo et al. 2017 [26] | Flanagan et al. 2016 [17] | Omara et al. 2016 [24] | Fukuda et al. 2005 [18] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection | |||||||||||
| • Representativeness of the exposed cohort | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| • Selection of the non-exposed cohort | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| • Ascertainment of exposure | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| • Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| Comparability | |||||||||||
| • Study controls for bone ring group | * | * | |||||||||
| • Study control for any additional factor (duration of exposure) | * | * | |||||||||
| Outcome | |||||||||||
| • Assessment of outcome | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| • Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur? | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
| • Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
| Newcastle-Ottawa scale | 9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 |