Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 12;6:82. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00280-0

Table 3.

Quality assessment of observational studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale

Wychowansky et al. 2020 [11] Yuce et al. 2019 [12] Nord et al. 2019 [23] Giesenhagen et al. 2019 [20] Chandra et al. 2019 [10] Sindel et al. 2018 [27] Giraddi et al. 2017 [21] Rizzo et al. 2017 [26] Flanagan et al. 2016 [17] Omara et al. 2016 [24] Fukuda et al. 2005 [18]
Selection
• Representativeness of the exposed cohort * * * * * * * * * * *
• Selection of the non-exposed cohort * * * * * * * * * * *
• Ascertainment of exposure * * * * * * * * * * *
• Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study * * * * * * * * * * *
Comparability
• Study controls for bone ring group * *
• Study control for any additional factor (duration of exposure) * *
Outcome
• Assessment of outcome * * * * * * * * * * *
• Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur? * * * * * * * *
• Adequacy of follow up of cohorts * * * * * * * *
Newcastle-Ottawa scale 9 7 7 7 9 7 5 7 7 5 7