Table 2.
Univariate model | Multivariate model | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95%) | p value | HR (95%) | p value | |
Sex | ||||
Female | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Male | 1.9 (1–3.7) | 0.04 | 11.8 (1.3–100.7) | 0.02 |
Age | ||||
≤ 50 | 1 | – | 1 | |
51–64 | 1.6 (0.6–4) | 0.27 | 1.1 (0.4–3.1) | 0.8 |
≥ 65 | 3.3 (1.4–7.5) | 0.005 | 4.1 (1.5–11) | 0.004 |
Marital status | ||||
Single* | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Married | 0.36 (0.2–0.6) | < 0.001 | 0.7 (0.3–1.3) | 0.3 |
Residence | ||||
Rural | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Urban | 0.5 (0.3–0.7) | 0.001 | 0.8 (0.4–1.6) | 0.5 |
Occupation | ||||
Unemployed/Retired | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Housewife | 1.2 (0.5–26.8) | 0.6 | 11.3 (1.1–116.8) | 0.04 |
Worker | 2.2 (1–4.7) | 0.04 | 2.6 (1.1–6.2) | 0.03 |
Self-employed | 2.2 (1.1–4.4) | 0.03 | 3.3 (1.5–7.1) | 0.002 |
Office job | 1.8 (0.7–4.4) | 0.19 | 4.9 (1.7–13.9) | 0.003 |
Agriculturist | 3.1 (1.6–6.1) | 0.001 | 1.8 (0.7–4.4) | 0.2 |
Education | ||||
Illiterate | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Literate | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.003 | 1.1 (0.6–2) | 0.8 |
Socioeconomic status | ||||
Poor | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Moderate | 0.6 (0.3–0.9) | 0.02 | 0.5 (0.3–1) | 0.06 |
Rich | 0.35 (0.2–0.6) | < 0.001 | 0.4 (0.2–0.8) | 0.01 |
TNM stage | ||||
I | 1 | – | 1 | – |
II | 2.4 (1.5–4) | < 0.001 | 1.5 (0.7–2.9) | 0.2 |
III | 7.9 (4.7–13.4) | < 0.001 | 2.8 (1.3–5.8) | 0.006 |
IV | 7.3 (3.2–16.6) | < 0.001 | 6.4 (2.1–19.3) | 0.001 |
Grade | ||||
Poorly differentiated | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Well differentiated | 5.2 (3.4–7.9) | < 0.001 | 3.2 (1.7–6) | < 0.001 |
Treatment | ||||
Radiation therapy | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Surgery | 0.8 (0.3–2.1) | 0.6 | 0.9 (0.3–2.6) | 0.8 |
Chemotherapy | 1.7 (0.4–6.6) | 0.4 | 1.5 (0.3–6.2) | 0.6 |
Combinational treatment | 1.3 (0.4–3.7) | 0.6 | 0.9 (0.5–5) | 0.4 |
Histologic type | ||||
Adenocarcinoma | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Squamous cell carcinoma | 1.3 (0.3–5.1) | 0.7 | 4.7 (0.8–26.8) | 0.08 |
Urothelial carcinoma | 0.46 (0.19–1) | 0.06 | 1.6 (0.5–4.5) | 0.4 |
HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
*Unmarried, divorced, widow/widower