Table 5.
Hips | Design | Patient selection (hips) | Follow-up (Mons) | Survivorship | End point | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tsao et al. (2005) [24] | 94 | Prospective | Steinberg I (1) II(93) | 48 | 72.5% at 48mons | THA |
Veilette et al. (2006) [23] | 58 | Retropective | Steinberg I (1) II(49) III (8) (1)II(93)StageI(1)II(49)l(8) | 24 | 68.1% at 48mons | THA |
Nadeau et al. (2007) [13] | 18 | Prospective | Steinberg III (3) IV(15) | 23.2 | 42.5% at 48mons | THA |
Varitimidis et al. (2009) [16] | 26 | Prospective | Steinberg I (9) II(7) III (10) | 38 | 70% at 6 years | THA |
Liu et al. (2010) [25] | 49 | Prospective | Steinberg I (21) II (26) IIIA(2) | 15.2 | 83.7% | THA |
Floerkemeier et al. (2011) [22] | 23 | Retropective | ARCO I II | 529(days) | 44% | THA |
Liu et a al. (2013) [26] | 94 | Prospective | Steinberg I (27) II (49) III(18) | 37.3 |
I 88.9% II 79.6% III 55.6% |
THA |
Ma et al. (2016) [27] | 104 | Retrospective | ARCO II(42) III(62) | 42 | 52.9% | THA |
Hu et al. (2018) [28] | 29 | Prospective | ARCO I (5) II(24) | 5.4 (year) | 93.1% | THA |