Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;11:566222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566222

TABLE 7.

The relationships of the character strengths balance and the number of character strengths represented in each team with self- and supervisor-rated performance, work satisfaction, and teamwork quality.

Individual performance
Team performance
Work satisfaction
Teamwork quality
Self Supervisor Self Self agg Supervisor Self Self Self agg
Character strengths balance 0.09 0.12 0.02 –0.01 0.25 –0.04 0.07 0.07
No. of members
Creativity 0.06 –0.02 –0.11 –0.16 –0.16 –0.02 –0.12 –0.19
Curiosity 0.14 0.13 0.08 0.13 0.15 0.05 0.09 0.12
Judgment 0.09 0.04 0.15 0.24 0.10 0.01 0.14 0.23
Learning 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.10
Perspective 0.03 0.02 0.11 0.16 0.12 –0.04 0.20 0.24
Bravery 0.13 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.15 –0.14 –0.06 –0.07
Perseverance 0.11 –0.11 –0.06 –0.02 –0.09 –0.01 –0.02 0.01
Honesty 0.12 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.14
Zest –0.02 0.11 –0.01 –0.02 0.20 –0.07 –0.03 –0.05
Love 0.06 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.19 0.01 0.08 0.09
Kindness 0.06 –0.02 0.12 0.17 –0.07 0.05 0.12 0.16
Social intelligence –0.05 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.16 –0.08 0.03 0.07
Teamwork 0.05 –0.09 0.12 0.20 –0.18 0.08 0.21 0.30
Fairness 0.07 0.13 0.18 0.30 0.14 0.03 0.28* 0.39*
Leadership 0.08 –0.01 0.16 0.26 0.15 –0.02 0.14 0.20
Forgiveness 0.09 0.05 0.17 0.31 0.06 0.02 0.14 0.23
Humility 0.20 –0.17 0.20 0.39 0.04 0.03 0.24 0.39
Prudence 0.28** 0.11 0.35** 0.60** 0.23 0.07 0.34* 0.45*
Self-regulation 0.16 –0.03 0.01 0.06 0.12 –0.10 –0.14 –0.16
ABE –0.01 0.03 –0.02 –0.02 0.09 –0.01 0.05 0.08
Gratitude –0.06 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.14
Hope 0.08 0.04 –0.05 –0.11 0.18 –0.04 –0.15 –0.19
Humor –0.01 –0.03 0.08 0.16 0.13 –0.03 0.10 0.17
Spirituality 0.00 0.01 –0.13 –0.21 –0.07 –0.09 –0.08 –0.15

NIndividual = 277–284; NTeams = 36–42 (for aggregated self-reported team performance and teamwork quality, and supervisor-rated team performance). Self Agg, Team-level aggregated self-reports; Character Strengths Balance, Index of how many of the 24 character strengths are represented in a team; No. of members, How many members of a team represented the character strength of interest; Learning, Love of learning; ABE, Appreciation of beauty and excellence. All coefficients are standardized fixed effects from multilevel level models. All analyses with Level-1 outcomes (all self-ratings and supervisor ratings of individual performance) were controlled for team size and individual and team-level gender, age, education, and duration of team membership. Analyses with Level-2 outcomes (all aggregated ratings, and supervisor-ratings of team performance) were controlled for team size, gender ratio, average age, average education, and average duration of team membership.*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.