Table 6.
Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement Candidates Who Might Benefit from Knowing Their Coronary Artery Calcium Score Is Zero |
---|
Patients reluctant to initiate statin who wish to understand their risk and potential for benefit more precisely |
Patients concerned about need to reinstitute statin therapy after discontinuation for statin-associated symptoms |
Older patients (men 55–80 y of age; women 60–80 y of age) with low burden of risk factorsS4.3-53 who question whether they would benefit from statin therapy |
Middle-aged adults (40–55 y of age) with PCE-calculated 10-year risk of ASCVD 5% to <7.5% with factors that increase their ASCVD risk, although they are in a borderline risk group. |
Caveats: If patient is at intermediate risk and if a risk decision is uncertain and a coronary artery calcium score is obtained, it is reasonable to withhold statin therapy unless higher-risk conditions, such as cigarette smoking, family history of premature ASCVD, or diabetes mellitus, are present and to reassess coronary artery calcium score in 5 to 10 years. Moreover, if coronary artery calcium scoring is recommended, it should be performed in facilities that have current technology and expertise to deliver the lowest radiation possible.
ASCVD indicates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and PCE, pooled cohort equations.
Reproduced with permission from Grundy et al.S4.3-1 Copyright © 2018, American Heart Association, Inc., and American College of Cardiology Foundation.