Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e043312. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043312

Table 2.

Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants

Variable FGD participants IDI participants
Number (%) Number (%)
Age group
 18–30 12 (25) 12 (30)
 31–40 18 (37.5) 14 (35)
 41–50 10 (20.83) 8 (20)
 51–60 8 (16.67) 6 (15)
Sex
 Female 24 (50) 18 (45)
 Male 24 (50) 22 (55)
Religion
 Hindu 30 (62.5) 24 (60)
 Buddhist 8 (16.67) 8 (20)
 Muslim 4 (8.33) 4 (10)
 Others 6 (12.5) 4 (10)
Marital status
 Single 18 (37.5) 15 (37.5)
 Married 30 (62.5) 25 (62.5)
Ethnicity
 Brahmin 14 (29.17) 12 (30)
 Chhetri 12 (25) 12 (30)
 Indigenous 12 (25) 9 (22.5)
 Others 10 (20.83) 7 (17.5)
Highest level of education
 Did not go to school 12 (25) 5 (12.5)
 Grade 10 or below 9 (18.75) 8 (20)
 Grade 12 7 (14.58) 8 (20)
 Bachelor 12 (25) 14 (35)
 Masters and above 8 (16.67) 5 (12.5)
Respondent type
 Teachers 3 (6.25) 4 (10)
 Students 5 (10.41) 4 (10)
 Security personnel 5 (10.41) 4 (10)
 Head of household 5 (10.41) 4 (10)
 Leaders 6 (12.5) 8 (20)
 Health workers 7 (14.58) 8 (20)
 Homemaker 7 (14.58) 2 (5)
 Others 10 (20.83) 6 (15)
Resource setting
 Rural 24 (50) 20 (50)
 Urban 24 (50) 20 (50)
Geographical location
 Himalayan region 12 (25) 10 (25)
 Hilly region 12(25) 10 (25)
 Terai region 24(50) 20 (50)

FGD, focus group discussion; IDI, in-depth interview.