Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):1249–1257. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004428

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Primary and secondary study outcomes. A, Clinical impact: Bar graphs comparing physicians’ diagnostic and treatment decisions and confidence level for all 181 cases (two values missing). High confidence combined “high” and “very high” categories (ratings of 4 and 5). B, Time to EEG: Delays in obtaining Rapid-EEG (blue) compared with conventional EEG (orange) during business hours (lighter shade) and after-hours (darker shade). Note the high variance in hours to conventional EEG across sites compared with minutes to obtain Rapid-EEG. C, Ease of use: Perceived ease of use of the headband sensors (light blue) and recording device (dark blue) was high.