Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;142(47):20216–20231. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c10701

Table 1. Calculated Activation (ΔG) and Reaction Free Energies (ΔG0), Obtained Using the Empirical Valence Bond Approach, As Well As Relevant Corresponding Experimental Observables, For the Decarboxylation of Compounds 1a through 1e by Wild-Type AMDase and Variantsa.

system
Pro-(R)
Pro-(S)
experimental data
    ΔG ΔG0 ΔG ΔG0 selectivity kcat ΔGexp
1a WT 15.6 ± 0.4 14.0 ± 0.6 26.6 ± 0.6 24.9 ± 0.6 (R) 27923 14.123
G74C/C188G 23.1 ± 0.6 21.4 ± 0.6 30.3 ± 0.7 28.7 ± 0.6 (S) 0.00435 21.635
CLG-IPL 26.8 ± 0.7 24.6 ± 0.7 18.1 ± 0.4 17.2 ± 0.4 (S) 3.835 17.435
1b WT 15.9 ± 0.7 12.9 ± 0.9 20.2 ± 0.7 18.5 ± 0.8 (R) 15.1,18 3120 16.1,18 15.420
G74C/C188G 17.9 ± 0.9 14.1 ± 0.9 23.4 ± 0.7 21.7 ± 0.7 (S)    
G74C/C188A 20.7 ± 0.9 17.2 ± 1.0 21.2 ± 0.7 18.0 ± 0.9 (S)    
CLG-IPL 16.7 ± 0.5 14.0 ± 0.7 15.8 ± 0.6 12.5 ± 0.7 (S) 23.7,18 7020 15.9,18 15.020
1c WT 18.0 ± 0.3 17.1 ± 0.3 24.6 ± 0.9 21.5 ± 1.0 (R) 38.718 15.618
G74C/C188G 22.7 ± 0.4 20.6 ± 0.5 26.9 ± 0.6 25.3 ± 0.7 (S) 0.07734 19.034
CLG-IPL 22.3 ± 0.7 20.3 ± 0.7 14.4 ± 0.4 13.7 ± 0.5 (S) 4.318 16.918
1d WT 28.3 ± 0.8 25.8 ± 0.9 32.9 ± 1.8 29.9 ± 1.7      
1e WT 18.0 ± 0.4 16.3 ± 0.5 35.4 ± 0.7 33.7 ± 0.7 (R) 0.2335 19.135
CLG-IPL 34.4 ± 1.7 31.7 ± 1.5 17.1 ± 0.6 15.9 ± 0.6 (S) 0.5635 18.635
a

All calculated values are averages and standard error of the mean over 30 individual EVB trajectories per system, as described in the Methodology section, and shown here are data obtained from modeling the decarboxylation of each compound through cleavage of either the pro-(R) or pro-(S) carboxylate groups. WT denotes the wild-type enzyme. Both experimental and calculated activation and reaction free energies are presented in kcal mol–1. Shown here are also the experimentally observed selectivities for each compound, as well as the corresponding kinetics (kcat, s–1) and activation free energies (ΔGexp) derived from the experimentally observed activities toward each compound by each variant, as presented in refs (18, 20, 23, 34, and 35). The kcat values were either taken directly from the literature, or were estimated by using the relationship kcat = (specific activity × molecular weight). The calculated activation free energies were obtained from the kcat values using transition state theory at temperature 30 °C (for ref (18)), 37 °C (for ref (35)), and 25 °C for the rest. Note that the specific activities were obtained from bar graphs provided in ref (18) and therefore the experimental kinetics and energetics are only approximate. Blank cells denote that experimental data is not available for a given system.