Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;112(12):1242–1250. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa030

Table 2.

Estimated tubo-ovarian carcinoma and breast cancer relative risk for RAD51C and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers

Cancer and models considered Age, y RR (95% CI) P * LRT P AIC Best fitting models
RAD51C
 Tubo-ovarian carcinoma
  Age-constant model 30–79 7.55 (5.60 to 10.19) 5 × 10-40 4335.8
  Age-specific model for each decade of age 30–39 2.85 (0.46 to 17.70) 0.04 4334.0
40–49 5.94 (3.09 to 11.43)
50–59 8.55 (5.10 to 14.33)
60–69 13.90 (8.45 to 22.88)
70–79 2.54 (0.53 to 12.27)
  Age-specific model, separate parameters for two age groups: 30–50 and 50–80 y 30–49 4.97 (2.75 to 8.97) 0.048 4333.8
50–79 9.44 (6.63 to 13.45)
  Piecewise linear model 35 2.40 0.004 4328.6 Yes
45 5.14
55 11.02
65 9.02
75 2.82
 Breast cancer
  Age-constant model 20–79 1.99 (1.39 to 2.85) 1.55 × 10-4 4346.4 Yes
  Age-specific model, separate parameters for each decade of age 20–29 1.19 (0.09 to 16.12) 0.37 4351.0
30–39 3.25 (1.60 to 6.62)
40–49 2.50 (1.41 to 4.45)
50–59 0.96 (0.34 to 2.71)
60–69 1.54 (0.45 to 5.36)
70–79 2.57 (0.61 to 10.81)
  Age-specific model, separate parameters for two age groups: 20–50 and 50–80 y 20–49 2.42 (1.61 to 3.63) 0.12 4346.0
50–79 1.36 (0.70 to 2.63)
RAD51D
 Tubo-ovarian carcinoma
  Age-constant model 30–79 7.60 (5.61 to 10.30) 5 × 10-39 4160.0
  Age-specific model for each decade of age 30–39 3.60 (0.78 to 16.75) 0.02 4155.8
40–49 3.19 (1.04 to 9.72)
50–59 12.54 (7.62 to 20.63)
60–69 10.60 (6.10 to 18.41)
70–79 4.94 (1.34 to 18.26)
  Age-specific model, separate parameters for two age groups: 30–50 and 50–80 y 30–49 3.23 (1.36 to 7.71) 0.002 4152.1
50–79 10.56 (7.48 to 14.91)
  Piecewise linear model§ 35 1.64 0.002 4151.6 Yes
45 4.30
55 11.29
65 10.16
75 5.77
 Breast cancer
  Age-constant model 20–79 1.83 (1.24 to 2.72) 0.0002 4177.9 Yes
  Age-specific model, separate parameters for each decade of age except for 20–39 y age group 20–39 2.25 (1.25 to 4.04) 0.59 4183.1
40–49 1.46 (0.69 to 3.09)
50–59 1.56 (0.69 to 3.51)
60–69 1.63 (0.54 to 4.98)
70–79 4.19 (1.51 to 11.62)
  Age-specific model, separate parameters for two age groups: 20–50 and 50–80 y 20–49 1.84 (1.12 to 3.02) 1.00 4179.9
50–79 1.83 (1.02 to 3.26)
*

The P values assessing the null hypothesis of RR = 1.00. AIC = Akaike information criterion; CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk.

Likelihood ratio tests (LRT) comparing each model against the model with a constant RR.

logRR(t) = a + b1(t − 30) if t ∈ [30,60); logRR(t) = a + b1 × 30 + b2(t − 60) if t ∈ [60,80), where a = 0.49 (95% CI = −0.80 to 1.78), b1 = 0.076 (95% CI = 0.023 to 0.13), b2 = −0.12 (95% CI = −0.23 to −0.0036).

§

logRR(t) = a + b1(t − 30) if t ∈ [30,58); logRR(t) = a + b1 × 28 + b2(t − 58) if t ∈ [58,80), where a = 0.010 (95% CI = −1.49 to 1.51), b1 = 0.097 (95% CI = 0.034 to 0.16), b2 = −0.057 (95% CI = −0.13 to 0.017).