Table 2.

Post hoc comparisons of credibility of the teacher’s response across conditions.

		Non-response – boys	Non-response – girls
		M = 0.81	M = 0.69
Comforting victim – boys	M = 0.95	∆M = −0.14, SE = 0.05	∆M = −0.26**, SE = 0.05
Comforting victim – girls	M = 0.95	∆M = −0.14, SE = 0.05	∆M = −0.26**, SE = 0.05
Correcting bully – boys	M = 0.99	∆M = −0.18*, SE = 0.05	∆M = −0.29**, SE = 0.05
Correcting bully – girls	M = 0.99	∆M = −0.18*, SE = 0.05	∆M = −0.29**, SE = 0.05
Comforting victim + Correcting bully – boys	M = 0.97	∆M = −0.16, SE = 0.05	∆M = −0.28**, SE = 0.05
Comforting victim + Correcting bully – girls	M = 0.99	∆M = −0.18*, SE = 0.05	∆M = −0.30**, SE = 0.05

Mean differences regarding the credibility of the teacher’s response between the non-response conditions and the active response conditions are presented. Other post hoc comparisons revealed no significant differences.

^*p < 0.010

^**p < 0.001.