Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;50(2):361–369. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03561-2

Table 2.

One-way ANOVA of Erlenmeyer flask deformity severity against volume and width ratios. Ratios with non-overlapping confidence intervals are in italics. Tukey’s HSD is reported with “EFD 0/1” representing the comparison between groups with EFD Severity Rating 0 and EFD Severity Rating 1, and similarly for the “EFD 0/2” and “EFD 1/2”

Ratios EFD Severity Rating (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = severe) 95% confidence interval F-statistic p value Tukey’s HSD
Volume46cmVolume02cm 0 0.50–0.55 119.02 < 0.0001 EFD 0/1: 0.099 (p < 0.0001)
1 0.61–0.64 EFD 0/2: 0.202 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.71–0.75 EFD 1/2: 0.103 (p < 0.0001)
Volume46cmVolume24cm 0 0.74–0.79 23.04 < 0.001 EFD 0/1: 0.065 (p < 0.001)
1 0.80–0.85 EFD 0/2: 0.103 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.85–0.88 EFD 1/2: 0.038 (p < 0.05)
Volume24cmVolume02cm 0 0.68–0.71 78.61 < 0.0001 EFD 0/1: 0.067 (p < 0.0001)
1 0.75–0.77 EFD 0/2: 0.153 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.83–0.86 EFD 1/2: 0.086 (p < 0.0001)
Width2cmWidth Physis 0 0.70–0.77 20.41 < 0.001 EFD 0/1: not significant
1 0.74–0.78 EFD 0/2: 0.115 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.82–0.88 EFD 1/2: 0.093 (p < 0.0001)
Width4cmWidth Physis 0 0.49–0.57 51.89 < 0.001 EFD 0/1: 0.055 (p < 0.05)
1 0.57–0.60 EFD 0/2: 0.194 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.69–0.75 EFD 1/2: 0.139 (p < 0.0001)
Width6cmWidth Physis 0 0.39–0.47 54.25 < 0.001 EFD 0/1: 0.082 (p < 0.001)
1 0.49–0.53 EFD 0/2: 0.211 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.61–0.67 EFD 1/2: 0.129 (p < 0.0001)
Width4cmWidth2cm 0 0.69–0.75 37.79 < 0.001 EFD 0/1: 0.054 (p < 0.01)
1 0.75–0.80 EFD 0/2: 0.13 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.83–0.87 EFD 1/2: 0.077 (p < 0.0001)
Width6cmWidth2cm 0 0.55–0.61 32.85 < 0.001 EFD 0/1: 0.096 (p < 0.001)
1 0.65–0.71 EFD 0/2: 0.170 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.73–0.77 EFD 1/2: 0.074 (p < 0.001)
Width6cmWidth4cm 0 0.78–0.84 11.68 < 0.001 EFD 0/1: 0.066 (p < 0.001)
1 0.85–0.90 EFD 0/2: 0.076 (p < 0.0001)
2 0.87–0.90 EFD 1/2: not significant