Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 23.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020 Jul 23;159:245–293. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.013

Table 2:

Lipidomic studies reporting prognostic lipid signatures in biofluids

Cancer type Samples Outcome MS biofluid Lipids altered Reference
Measure Platform
Lung 300 Pre-treatment Risk of cancer development LC//MS Plasma Shingosine 1-phosphate Alberg et al, 2013 [9]
Prostate 3,057 Matched case-controls (EPIC study) Development of advanced or aggressive prostate cancer MS) Plasma PCs, lysoPCs Schmidt et al, 2020 [10]
Hepatocellular carcinoma 43 Responders vs non-responders to sorafenib RPLC-MS Plasma PC34:2; PC34:3; PC35:2; PC36:4a; PC34:3e; acylcarnitine (18:0); cholesterol ester (20:2); DG34:2 Saito et al, 2018 [11]
Ovarian 101 Recurrence vs non-recurrence following standard of care therapy UPLC-MS plasma 31 lipids predicted recurrence; LPG20:5 increased predictive power of current clinical predictors; reduced triacylglycerides predicted early relapse Li et al, 2017 [12]
Prostate 159 Overall survival LC-MS/MS plasma Cer (d18:1/24:1); SM(d18:2/16:0); PC(16:0/16:0) Lin et al, 2017 [13]