Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 6;36(2):251–272. doi: 10.1007/s40616-020-00136-z

Table 1.

Conditions Evaluated With Each Group of Participants

Group 1
Ben and Aria
Group 2
Megan and April
Group 3
Miriam and Elis

FR 1 Vary (I) – red

Lag 0 No Vary (C) – red

Lag 1 Vary (I) – purple

Lag 2 Vary (I) – orange

FR 1 Vary (I) – red

Lag 0 No Vary (C) – red

Lag 2 Vary (I) – orange

Lag 3 Vary (I) – purple

FR 1 No Vary (C) – red

FR 1 Vary (I) – red

Lag 0 No Vary (C) – red

Lag 1 Vary (I) – purple

Lag 3 Vary (I) – orange

FR 1 No Vary (C) – red

FR 1 Vary (C) – red

Lag 5 Vary (I) – orange

Note. FR = fixed ratio; I = incomplete, inaccurate instruction; C = complete, accurate instruction. Followed by color of token board