Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2020 Jun 22;222:117054. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117054

Figure 7: Model comparison for d = 1, d = 2 and d = 3 structural disorder classes, and for the kärgermodel.

Figure 7:

a)Mean kurtosis K(t) in cortical gray matter plotted as a function of t−0.5. b) K(t) plotted as a function of t−1. c) K(t) plotted as a function of [ln(t/δ)+32]/(tδ/3). d) Mean kurtosis along with the Kärger 2 model fit, Eq. (3), with K ≡ 0 in blue, and the Kärger model with an added constant K∞ as black dashed line. All the fit results are summarized in Section 4.2 and 4.3. The residuals between the fit curves and measured data are shown in the bottom row.