Table 2.
Predictive performance of TMVR in-hospital mortality models by number of variables.*
| Number of variables | Random Forest | Naїve Bayes | Artificial Neural Network | Logistic Regression | Support-Vector Machine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.50 (0.49–0.50) | 0.57 (0.53–0.59) | 0.50 (0.49–0.51) | 0.57 (0.43–0.71) | 0.57 (0.43–0.71) |
| 10 | 0.82 (0.79–0.86) | 0.78 (0.75–0.81) | 0.81 (0.77–0.84) | 0.82 (0.79–0.86) | 0.81 (0.77–0.84) |
| 15 | 0.67 (0.47–0.87) | 0.83 (0.80–0.86) | 0.73 (0.55–0.91) | 0.77 (0.58–0.95) | 0.67 (0.47–0.87) |
| 20 | 0.61 (0.41–0.81) | 0.74 (0.60–0.88) | 0.74 (0.56–0.92) | 0.71 (0.51–0.91) | 0.61 (0.41–0.81) |
| 25 | 0.47 (0.33–0.62) | 0.72 (0.58–0.87) | 0.71 (0.51–0.91) | 0.71 (0.51–0.91) | 0.63 (0.43–0.83) |
| 30 | 0.65 (0.45–0.85) | 0. 68 (0.49–0.86) | 0.72 (0.52–0.92) | 0.71 (0.51–0.91) | 0.65 (0.45–0.85) |
Data are presented as AUC (95% Confidence Interval)