Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jun 15;22:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.06.017

Table 2.

Predictive performance of TMVR in-hospital mortality models by number of variables.*

Number of variables Random Forest Naїve Bayes Artificial Neural Network Logistic Regression Support-Vector Machine
5 0.50 (0.49–0.50) 0.57 (0.53–0.59) 0.50 (0.49–0.51) 0.57 (0.43–0.71) 0.57 (0.43–0.71)
10 0.82 (0.79–0.86) 0.78 (0.75–0.81) 0.81 (0.77–0.84) 0.82 (0.79–0.86) 0.81 (0.77–0.84)
15 0.67 (0.47–0.87) 0.83 (0.80–0.86) 0.73 (0.55–0.91) 0.77 (0.58–0.95) 0.67 (0.47–0.87)
20 0.61 (0.41–0.81) 0.74 (0.60–0.88) 0.74 (0.56–0.92) 0.71 (0.51–0.91) 0.61 (0.41–0.81)
25 0.47 (0.33–0.62) 0.72 (0.58–0.87) 0.71 (0.51–0.91) 0.71 (0.51–0.91) 0.63 (0.43–0.83)
30 0.65 (0.45–0.85) 0. 68 (0.49–0.86) 0.72 (0.52–0.92) 0.71 (0.51–0.91) 0.65 (0.45–0.85)
*

Data are presented as AUC (95% Confidence Interval)