Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 14;14(2):100991. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100991

Table 3.

28 TAs showed significantly differential signal intensities between lung cancer patients and cancer-free smokers.

GenBank ID Protein Description Ratio* pvalue
BC039826.1 DEAD (Asp‐Glu‐Ala‐Asp) box polypeptide 6 (DDX6) 43.6 3.36E03
NP_001419.1 Enolase 1 (ENO1) 33.8 7.36E03
BC050424.1 F‐box protein 38 (FBXO38) 26.2 2.76E03
NP_001129173.1 14–3–3 protein zeta (14–3–3ζ) 19.7 5.60E03
NP_640,343.1 Cancer/testis antigen 1 (CTAG1A) 15.9 4.50E03
PV3665 Casein kinase 1, delta (CSNK1D) 12.1 7.32E03
CAA56734.1 Cell surface associated Mucin 1 (MUC1) 10.7 1.78E03
BC026100.2 Testis‐specific transcript, Y‐linked 8 (TTTY8) 8.4 1.80E−03
BC059404.1 B‐cell CLL/lymphoma 6, member B (BCL6B) 7.8 4.01E−02
NM_002742.1 Serine/threonine‐protein kinase D1 (PRKD1) 7.5 2.37E−02
NP_000691.1 Annexin 1 (ANXA1) 6.9 2.86E−02
BC001497.2 RAN binding protein 5 (RANBP5) 5.1 2.35E−02
NM_005118.2 tumor necrosis factor superfamily, member 15 (TNFSF15) 4.6 3.21E−03
BC005220.1 Chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 8 (theta) (CCT8) 45.1 8.33E−03
AAH04364.1 Transmembrane protein 39B (TMEM39B) 3.2 3.65E-02
NM_006792.2 Mortality factor 4 (MORF4) 43.3 2.33E−02
NM_203,454. Putative C‐>U‐editing enzyme APOBEC‐4 (APOBEC4) 28.3 1.67E−02
XM_936,115.1 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DQ(3) alpha chain (HLA-DQA3) 22.6 2.13E-02
PV3825 Casein kinase 1, gamma 1 (CSNK1G1) 21.9 1.67E−02
NM_002622.3 Prefoldin subunit 1 (PFDN1) 17.3 2.63E−02
NM_031966.4 Cyclin B1 (CCNB1) 4.7 2.67E−02
BC033708.1 Ral GEF with pH domain and SH3 binding motif 1 (RALGPS1) 4.8 4.50E−03
AAF66640.1 Heat shock protein HSP60 (HSP60) 40.3 2.38E−02
NM_005517.2 High‐mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 (HMGN2) 3.5 8.54E−03
BC041157.1 Thromboxane A synthase 1 (TBXAS1) 3.6 9.34E−03
BC096097.2 Histidine ammonia‐lyase (HAL) 4 6.23E−03
NM_172,160.1 Methylcrotonoyl‐Coenzyme A carboxylase 1 (alpha) (MCCC1) 10.6# 2.53E03
BC013119.1 Signal‐induced proliferation‐associated 1 like 2 (SIPA1L2) 3# 3.33E−02

signal intensity ratio of two groups.

#

the proteins’ signal intensity ratio is calculated by mean of signal intensity  of cancer-free smokers divided by that lung cancer patients, suggesting the proteins has a low level in lung cancer patients vs. cancer-free smokers.

The proteins in bold are chosen for subsequent ELISA validation based on criteria: 1) having differential signals between two the populations with a p ≤ 0.01 and, 2) having signal intensity ratio between the two populations being >10.0.