Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Recent Results Cancer Res. 2015;200:81–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20291-4_4

Table 1.

Summary of flow and image cytometry studies relating to genomic instability in various cancer types

Cancer type Method of
measuring
genomic
instability
Number
of
patients
Outcome
Shorter survival/poor
prognosis of
aneuploid/genomic
instable tumors
Reference
Colorectal cancer Flow cytometry 694 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Witzig et al. (1991)
Flow cytometry 528 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Sinicrope et al. (2006)
Image cytometry 213 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors without metastasis (Dukes’stage A & B) Bosari et al. (1992)
Image cytometry 288 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors; Aneuploidy strongest prognostic marker for CRC Gerling et al. (2010)
Flow and image cytometry 10,126 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Walther et al. (2008)
Image cytometry 217 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Laubert et al. (2013)
Genotyping of MSI markers 12,782 Higher survival rate of MSI tumors Guastadisegni et al. (2010)
Flow cytometry 163 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Flyger et al. (1999)
Image cytometry 219 Higher survival rate of euploid tumors Bondi et al. (2009)
Image cytometry 47 Diploid signal count of NCOA3 is associated with a longer adenoma recurrence-free surveillance Habermann et al. (2011a, b)
Image cytometry 78 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors; HDAC2 & TXNL1 marker for genomic stability Gemoll et al. (2011)
Breast cancer Image cytometry 227 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Fallenius et al. (1988)
Image cytometry 890 Higher survival rate of genomically stable subtypes Kronenwett et al. (2006)
Image cytometry 112 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Auer et al. (1980)
Image cytometry 48 12-gene signature predict degree of genomic instability and disease prognostication Habermann et al. (2009), Mettu et al. (2010)
Image cytometry 370 Lower survival rate of highly aneuploid tumors Yildrim-Assaf et al. (2007)
Image cytometry 599 Single cell aneuploidy as marker for genomic instability and biologic aggressiveness Sidoni et al. (2001)
Image cytometry 134 Lower survival rate of tumors with cancer cells with >5c DNA content Siitonen et al. (1993)
Flow cytometry 860 Hypertetraploidy as marker for biologic aggressiveness Pinto et al. (1997)
Endometrial cancer Flow cytometry 256 and 203 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Britton et al. (1989, 1990)
Flow cytometry 76 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Ikeda et al. (1993)
Image cytometry 358 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Lundgren et al. (2002)
Flow cytometry 174 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Susini et al. (2007)
Flow cytometry 363 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Wik et al. (2009)
Ovarian cancer Flow cytometry 682 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Akeson et al. (2009)
Image cytometry 284 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Kristensen et al. (2003)
Image cytometry 47 Higher survival rate of diploid tumors Kildal et al. (2004)
Large B-cell lymphoma H&E staining 54 Lower survival rate of patients with chromosomal instability Bakhoum et al. (2011)
Oral squamous cancer FISH 77 Lower survival rate of patients with chromosomal instability Sato et al. (2010)
Synovial sarcoma CGH 22 Lower survival rate of patients with specific chromosomal instability Nakagawa et al. (2006)