Table 1.
Cancer type | Method of measuring genomic instability |
Number of patients |
Outcome Shorter survival/poor prognosis of aneuploid/genomic instable tumors |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Colorectal cancer | Flow cytometry | 694 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Witzig et al. (1991) |
Flow cytometry | 528 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Sinicrope et al. (2006) | |
Image cytometry | 213 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors without metastasis (Dukes’stage A & B) | Bosari et al. (1992) | |
Image cytometry | 288 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors; Aneuploidy strongest prognostic marker for CRC | Gerling et al. (2010) | |
Flow and image cytometry | 10,126 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Walther et al. (2008) | |
Image cytometry | 217 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Laubert et al. (2013) | |
Genotyping of MSI markers | 12,782 | Higher survival rate of MSI tumors | Guastadisegni et al. (2010) | |
Flow cytometry | 163 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Flyger et al. (1999) | |
Image cytometry | 219 | Higher survival rate of euploid tumors | Bondi et al. (2009) | |
Image cytometry | 47 | Diploid signal count of NCOA3 is associated with a longer adenoma recurrence-free surveillance | Habermann et al. (2011a, b) | |
Image cytometry | 78 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors; HDAC2 & TXNL1 marker for genomic stability | Gemoll et al. (2011) | |
Breast cancer | Image cytometry | 227 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Fallenius et al. (1988) |
Image cytometry | 890 | Higher survival rate of genomically stable subtypes | Kronenwett et al. (2006) | |
Image cytometry | 112 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Auer et al. (1980) | |
Image cytometry | 48 | 12-gene signature predict degree of genomic instability and disease prognostication | Habermann et al. (2009), Mettu et al. (2010) | |
Image cytometry | 370 | Lower survival rate of highly aneuploid tumors | Yildrim-Assaf et al. (2007) | |
Image cytometry | 599 | Single cell aneuploidy as marker for genomic instability and biologic aggressiveness | Sidoni et al. (2001) | |
Image cytometry | 134 | Lower survival rate of tumors with cancer cells with >5c DNA content | Siitonen et al. (1993) | |
Flow cytometry | 860 | Hypertetraploidy as marker for biologic aggressiveness | Pinto et al. (1997) | |
Endometrial cancer | Flow cytometry | 256 and 203 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Britton et al. (1989, 1990) |
Flow cytometry | 76 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Ikeda et al. (1993) | |
Image cytometry | 358 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Lundgren et al. (2002) | |
Flow cytometry | 174 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Susini et al. (2007) | |
Flow cytometry | 363 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Wik et al. (2009) | |
Ovarian cancer | Flow cytometry | 682 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Akeson et al. (2009) |
Image cytometry | 284 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Kristensen et al. (2003) | |
Image cytometry | 47 | Higher survival rate of diploid tumors | Kildal et al. (2004) | |
Large B-cell lymphoma | H&E staining | 54 | Lower survival rate of patients with chromosomal instability | Bakhoum et al. (2011) |
Oral squamous cancer | FISH | 77 | Lower survival rate of patients with chromosomal instability | Sato et al. (2010) |
Synovial sarcoma | CGH | 22 | Lower survival rate of patients with specific chromosomal instability | Nakagawa et al. (2006) |