Table 1.
Example | Evaluation criterion | Target value |
A: testing and CI | Type 1 error | Close to and not greater than nominal value α |
Type 2 error | Low | |
Coverage of (1–α) CI | Close to and not lower than nominal value 1–α | |
B: explaining | Mean coefficient values | Close to true values (low bias) |
Precision of coefficient estimation | High (low variance) | |
Coverage of CI | Close to and not lower than nominal value 1–α | |
Sensitivity of variable selection | High | |
Specificity of variable selection | High | |
C: predicting | Prediction error on independent data | Low |
Accuracy measures | High | |
D: clustering | Agreement with true cluster structure | High |
All settings | Stability | High |
Computational cost | Low | |
Success of the computation (eg, ‘convergence’) | Yes |
The last column indicates which values the considered evaluation criterion takes if the investigated method is good.