Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):e040146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040146

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies examining prefrail or frail hospitalised older adults

Study Country N Mean age Study participants, characteristics Recruitment site Duration of intervention Follow-up period Frailty diagnostic tool/criteria used Reported % of prefrail, frail
Arrieta et al39 France 302 76.7±5.0 Frail, oncogeriatric, older men and women; BMI: 26.1±4.6 kg/m2 (UCG); 26.2±4.4 kg/m2 (IG) Acute hospital 1 y 1 y, 2 y Fried frailty phenotype criteria Non-frail: 73.6%
Frail: 26.4%
Rodriguez-Manas et al45 Spain 964 78.0±5.44 Frail older men and women with T2DM; BMI: 29.6±5.0 kg/m2 Acute hospitals or primary care sites 4.5 m (exercise), 3.5–4 w (nutrition) 1 y Fried frailty phenotype criteria Prefrail: 62.2%
Frail: 37.8%
Niccoli et al40 Canada 47 81.3±1.0 Frail older men and women hospitalised patients; BMI: 26.4±6.6 kg/m2 (UCG), 24.2±5.2 kg/m2 (IG) Acute hospital Average LOS (days): 20.9 (UCG), 26.5 (IG) On discharge Fried frailty phenotype criteria Prefrail: at least 87.8%
Frail: NR
Luger et al33* Austria 80 82.8±8.0 Frail older men and women;
BMI: 27.2±4.3 kg/m2
Acute hospital and community 3 m 3 m SHARE-FI (female >0.315; male >1.212 points) Non-frail: 1% prefrail: 35%, frail: 64%
Milte et al41 Australia 175 83.0±6.2 (UCG), 82.4±5.7 (IG) Frail older men and women posthip fracture, BMI: NR Acute hospital 6 m 6 m NR Frail: 100% as determined by study authors
Cameron et al29 Australia 241 83.3±5.9 Frail older men and women, BMI: 26.4±6.0 kg/m2 (UCG) 26.1±5.9 kg/m2 (IG) Acute hospital 1 y 3 m, 1 y Fried frailty phenotype criteria Frail: 100% as determined by study authors
Singh et al42 Australia 124 79.3±9.6 Frail older men and women; BMI: NR Acute hospital 1 y 4 m, 1 y NR Frail: 100% as determined by study authors
Villareal et al27 USA 107 69.3±4.1 Frail older men with obesity; BMI: 36.8±4.6 kg/m2 Acute hospital and community 1 y 6 m, 1 y ≥2 criteria: modified PPT score 18–32; VO2 peak of 11–18 mL/kg; difficulty in performing 2 IADL or 1 basic ADL Mild-to-moderate frailty: 100%
Azad et al46 Canada 91 74.2 and 75.8 Frail CHF older women;
BMI: NR
Acute hospital and community 6 w 6 w, 6 m Screened by a CHF coordinator, frailty assessment undefined Frail: 100% as determined by study authors
Blanc-Bisson et al43 France 76 85.4±6.6 Frail older men and women; BMI: 24.0±5.1 kg/m2 Acute hospital Until clinical stability Clinically stable, 1 m NR Frail: 100% as determined by study authors
Miller et al44 Australia 100 83.5±2.8 Frail older men and women with LL fracture; BMI: 22.1±4.3 kg/m2 (ACG), 23.2±kg/m2 (IG) Acute hospital 3 m 3 m NR Frail: 100%

BMI presented in mean±SD.

Multiple articles reported from same study, study chosen to represent other reports from the same study are mentioned in footnotes *, † and ‡.

*Luger et al33–Haider et al34, Winzer et al35, Kapan et al36, Kapan et al37 Haider et al38.

†Cameron et al27–Fairhall et al28, Fairhall et al29, Fairhall et al30.

‡Villareal et al27–Armamento-Villareal et al28.

ACG, attention control group; ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; CHF, chronic heart failure; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; IG, intervention group; LL, lower limb; LOS, length of stay; m, months; NR, not reported; PPT, physical performance test; SHARE-FI, Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe-Frailty Instrument; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UCG, usual care group; VO2, maximal oxygen uptake; w, weeks; y, years.