Table 1.
Study | Country | N | Mean age | Study participants, characteristics | Recruitment site | Duration of intervention | Follow-up period | Frailty diagnostic tool/criteria used | Reported % of prefrail, frail |
Arrieta et al39 | France | 302 | 76.7±5.0 | Frail, oncogeriatric, older men and women; BMI: 26.1±4.6 kg/m2 (UCG); 26.2±4.4 kg/m2 (IG) | Acute hospital | 1 y | 1 y, 2 y | Fried frailty phenotype criteria | Non-frail: 73.6% Frail: 26.4% |
Rodriguez-Manas et al45 | Spain | 964 | 78.0±5.44 | Frail older men and women with T2DM; BMI: 29.6±5.0 kg/m2 | Acute hospitals or primary care sites | 4.5 m (exercise), 3.5–4 w (nutrition) | 1 y | Fried frailty phenotype criteria | Prefrail: 62.2% Frail: 37.8% |
Niccoli et al40 | Canada | 47 | 81.3±1.0 | Frail older men and women hospitalised patients; BMI: 26.4±6.6 kg/m2 (UCG), 24.2±5.2 kg/m2 (IG) | Acute hospital | Average LOS (days): 20.9 (UCG), 26.5 (IG) | On discharge | Fried frailty phenotype criteria | Prefrail: at least 87.8% Frail: NR |
Luger et al33* | Austria | 80 | 82.8±8.0 | Frail older men and women; BMI: 27.2±4.3 kg/m2 |
Acute hospital and community | 3 m | 3 m | SHARE-FI (female >0.315; male >1.212 points) | Non-frail: 1% prefrail: 35%, frail: 64% |
Milte et al41 | Australia | 175 | 83.0±6.2 (UCG), 82.4±5.7 (IG) | Frail older men and women posthip fracture, BMI: NR | Acute hospital | 6 m | 6 m | NR | Frail: 100% as determined by study authors |
Cameron et al29† | Australia | 241 | 83.3±5.9 | Frail older men and women, BMI: 26.4±6.0 kg/m2 (UCG) 26.1±5.9 kg/m2 (IG) | Acute hospital | 1 y | 3 m, 1 y | Fried frailty phenotype criteria | Frail: 100% as determined by study authors |
Singh et al42 | Australia | 124 | 79.3±9.6 | Frail older men and women; BMI: NR | Acute hospital | 1 y | 4 m, 1 y | NR | Frail: 100% as determined by study authors |
Villareal et al27‡ | USA | 107 | 69.3±4.1 | Frail older men with obesity; BMI: 36.8±4.6 kg/m2 | Acute hospital and community | 1 y | 6 m, 1 y | ≥2 criteria: modified PPT score 18–32; VO2 peak of 11–18 mL/kg; difficulty in performing 2 IADL or 1 basic ADL | Mild-to-moderate frailty: 100% |
Azad et al46 | Canada | 91 | 74.2 and 75.8 | Frail CHF older women; BMI: NR |
Acute hospital and community | 6 w | 6 w, 6 m | Screened by a CHF coordinator, frailty assessment undefined | Frail: 100% as determined by study authors |
Blanc-Bisson et al43 | France | 76 | 85.4±6.6 | Frail older men and women; BMI: 24.0±5.1 kg/m2 | Acute hospital | Until clinical stability | Clinically stable, 1 m | NR | Frail: 100% as determined by study authors |
Miller et al44 | Australia | 100 | 83.5±2.8 | Frail older men and women with LL fracture; BMI: 22.1±4.3 kg/m2 (ACG), 23.2±kg/m2 (IG) | Acute hospital | 3 m | 3 m | NR | Frail: 100% |
BMI presented in mean±SD.
Multiple articles reported from same study, study chosen to represent other reports from the same study are mentioned in footnotes *, † and ‡.
ACG, attention control group; ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; CHF, chronic heart failure; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; IG, intervention group; LL, lower limb; LOS, length of stay; m, months; NR, not reported; PPT, physical performance test; SHARE-FI, Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe-Frailty Instrument; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UCG, usual care group; VO2, maximal oxygen uptake; w, weeks; y, years.