Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 13:1–10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004432

Table 3.

Regression estimates of percentage point changes in mental health problems from 2017–2019 to April–June 2020 comparing differences between population subgroups

Variable Subgroup differences in changes in mental health from 2017–2019 to April 2020 Subgroup differences in changes in mental health recovery from April to June 2020
(%)a 95% CI (%)a 95% CI
Age group (comparison is 50–64 years)
18–34 years +9.3*** (4.2–14.4) −6.7** (−11.8 to −1.6)
35–49 years +5.3** (1.5–9.2) −2.7 (−6.5 to 1.1)
65+ years +3.1 (−1.1 to 7.3) −2.6 (−6.7 to 1.5)
Femaleb +6.1*** (3.0–9.3) −4.6** (−7.8 to −1.3)
Whitec +0.8 (−6.2 to 7.9) −2.5 (−8.6 to 3.6)
Marriedd 0.0 (−3.4 to 3.4) −0.5 (−3.7 to 2.8)
University degreee +5.7*** (2.7–8.8) −2.6 (−5.7 to 0.5)
Income levelf (comparison is low)
Middle tertile +1.7 (−2.6 to 6.0) −2.2 (−6.3 to 1.9)
Top tertile +5.6** (1.8–9.5) −3.0 (−6.7 to 0.8)
COVID-19 risk +6.5 (−2.3 to 15.3) −2.5 (−9.7 to 4.7)

Note: Estimates are from marginal effects calculated after a logistic regression with standard errors adjusted for clustering at the individual-level and controlling for all characteristics presented. Age groups are based on age reported in the COVID-19 surveys.

a

Those with a GHQ ‘caseness’ score ⩾3 were classified as experiencing mental health problems.

b

Difference between females and males in the change in mental health problems between time points.

c

Difference between whites and non-whites in the change in mental health problems between time points.

d

Difference between married and non-married participants in the change in mental health problems between time points.

e

Difference between those with/without a degree in the change in mental health problems between time points.

f

Net household income in the 2017–2019 wave of the UKHLS.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.