Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e39–e44. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000790

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of enrolled patients

Group 1
−rUTI/+VET
(n=30)
Group 2
+rUTI/+VET
(n=20)
Group 3
+rUTI/−VET
(n=20)
Age [mean (SD)] 75.4 (7.3) 74.3 (7.1) 71.9 (8.5)
BMI [mean (SD)] 27.0 (4.0) 29.7 (7.0) 29.8 (5.2)
Recurrent UTI (% yes) 0 100 100
VET at enrollment (% yes) 100 100 0
Frequency of VET use [median (range)] 2 (1–3) 2 (2–3) --
Most recent uropathogen [n(%)]
E. coli -- 11 (55) 5 (25)
K. pneumoniae -- 3 (15) 4 (20)
Enterobacter spp -- 0 (0) 2 (10)
 Other* -- 6 (30) 9 (45)
Other rUTI prophylactic agents 0 15 (75) 11 (55)
 D-mannose 0 13 (65) 8 (40)
 Methenamine hippurate 0 6 (30) 3 (15)
 Vitamin C 0 10 (50) 6 (30)
 Cranberry supplementation 0 4 (20) 2 (10)

Group 1: no history of recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI), on vaginal estrogen therapy (VET). Group 2: history of rUTI, on VET. Group 3: history of rUTI, not on VET. BMI, body mass index. No difference between groups in age or BMI (p>0.05 for both). No difference between Group 1 and 2 in overall use of other rUTI prophylactic agents or specific agents (D-mannose, methenamine hippurate, vitamin C, cranberry, p>0.05 for all).

*

includes Enterococcus spp, Group B streptococcus, actinobactim, coagulase negative staphylococcus, Aerococcus, salmonella, pseudomonas aerongenes, streptococcus viridans