Table 4.
Multiplicative Model | ||||
Criteria in Defining LTPR | Crude OR (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted OR (95% CI)† | P value |
(1) Criteria by inhibition >20% | ||||
All PPIs | 1.28 (0.74–2.20) | .3814 | 1.15 (0.65–2.04) | .6295 |
Individual PPI | ||||
Lansoprazole | 0.98 (0.49–1.94) | .9426 | 0.89 (0.44–1.81) | .7406 |
Dexlansoprazole | 3.20 (1.19–8.62) | .0212∗ | 2.78 (0.99–7.74) | .0503 |
Pantoprazole | 1.37 (0.48–3.92) | .5540 | 1.26 (0.43–3.64) | .6744 |
Esomeprazole | 1.60 (0.54–4.78) | .3980 | 1.47 (0.49–4.44) | .4959 |
Rabeprazole | 0.36 (0.07–1.83) | .2168 | 0.31 (0.06–1.63) | .1655 |
(2) Criteria by PRU < 235 | ||||
All PPI | 1.43 (0.81–2.52) | .2137 | 1.20 (0.67–2.17) | .5427 |
Individual PPI | ||||
Lansoprazole | 1.29 (0.63–2.64) | .4841 | 1.10 (0.53–2.229) | .8058 |
Dexlansoprazole | 2.05 (0.85–4.97) | .1119 | 1.63 (0.65–4.10) | .2960 |
Pantoprazole | 2.05 (0.72–5.86) | .1804 | 1.80 (0.62–5.22) | .2822 |
Esomeprazole | 1.79 (0.61–5.30) | .2901 | 1.53 (0.51–4.61) | .4467 |
Rabeprazole | 0.29 (0.04–2.46) | .2583 | 0.23 (0.03–1.99) | .1834 |
(2) Criteria by PRU < 262 | ||||
All PPIs | 1.42 (0.79–2.56) | .2472 | 1.13 (0.61–2.10) | .6901 |
Individual PPI | ||||
Lansoprazole | 1.13 (0.53–2.42) | .7512 | 0.91 (0.41–1.99) | .8058 |
Dexlansoprazole | 2.70 (1.10–6.60) | .0297∗ | 1.93 (0.76–4.86) | .1651 |
Pantoprazole | 1.62 (0.55–4.80) | .3858 | 1.80 (0.62–5.22) | .2822 |
Esomeprazole | 1.80 (0.59–5.44) | .2990 | 1.45 (0.47–4.50) | .5230 |
Rabeprazole | 0.39 (0.05–3.25) | .3808 | 0.28 (0.03–2.35) | .2386 |
LTPR = low on-treatment platelet reactivity, OR = odds ratio, PPI = proton pump inhibitor. Model adjusted using the covariate of dual antiplatelet use.
Statistical significance (P <.05).
Model was adjusted using covariate of dual antiplatelet use.