Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 11;99(50):e23671. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023671

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses of the eligible studies for the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR based on various exclusion criteria.

Pooled sensitivity (95%CI), I2 Pooled specificity (95%CI), I2 Pooled DOR (95%CI), I2
Various exclusion criteria n/N LUS CXR LUS CXR LUS CXR
All included trials 2470/22 0.95 (0.94–0.96), 59.5% 0.91 (0.90–0.93), 85.3% 0.90 (0.87–0.92), 82.0% 1.00 (0.99–1.00), 0.0% 137.49 (60.21–313.98), 65.2% 369.66 (137.14–996,47), 52.9%
Number of patients ≤ 100 692/10 0.95 (0.93–0.97), 58.9% 0.91 (0.88–0.93), 83.5% 0.82 (0.75–0.87), 89.0% 0.99 (0.96–1.00), 0.0% 136.29 (25.33–733.44), 75.4% 213.77 (61.34–745.06), 30.2%
Number of patients > 100 1778/12 0.95 (0.93–0.96), 62.9% 0.92 (0.90–0.93), 87.5% 0.92 (0.90–0.94), 45.2% 1.00 (0.99–1.00), 9.9% 147.76 (67.89–321.58), 39.4% 599.85 (131.40–2738.44), 64.8%
Prospective study 2043/17 0.94 (0.93–0.95), 60.0% 0.92 (0.90–0.93), 85.8% 0.91 (0.89–0.93), 73.2% 1.00 (0.99–1.00), 0.0% 144.24 (65.74–316.49), 53.2% 572.95 (175.63–1869.11), 56.1%
Retrospective study 427/5 0.97 (0.95–0.98), 45.2% 0.90 (0.86–0.92), 86.2% 0.76 (0.64–0.85), 91.2% 0.98 (0.90–1.00), 0.0% 116.26 (6.02–2244.15), 81.5% 97.73 (19.19–497.66), 27.7%
Blind study 2230/19 0.95 (0.94–0.96), 61.4% 0.92 (0.90–0.93), 84.4% 0.91 (0.89–0.93), 70.3% 1.00 (0.99–1.00), 0.0% 159.07 (76.26–331.80), 48.4% 429.71 (145.65–1267.82), 54.9%
Non-blind study 240/3 0.93 (0.89–0.96), 54.9% 0.88 (0.83–0.92), 91.9% 0.65 (0.49–0.79), 94.4% 1.00 (0.89–1.00), 0.0% 40.55 (0.65–2525.41), 86.1% 147.60 (8.53–2553.79), 52.5%
Expert operator 1342/14 0.96 (0.95–0.97), 50.2% 0.90 (0.89–0.92), 82.3% 0.91 (0.86–0.95), 83.9% 0.99 (0.97–1.00), 0.0% 220.82 (49.86–977.93), 69.5% 160.33 (55.85–460.24), 32.1%
Non-expert operator 1128/8 0.92 (0.90–0.94), 49.9% 0.93 (0.91–0.95), 89.2% 0.89 (0.86–0.92), 80.0% 1.00 (0.99–1,00), 41.4% 89.52 (36.64–2218.73), 59.9% 1820.35 (250.85–13209.84), 68.4%
Ultrasound linear probe 1267/11 0.94 (0.91–0.95), 56.6% 0.91 (0.89–0.93), 85.9% 0.90 (0.87–0.92), 80.0% 0.99 (0.98–1.00), 31.3% 120.02 (49.65–290.13), 56.7% 528.92 (103.66–2698.84), 67.9%
Ultrasound convex probe 383/3 0.95 (0.92–0.97), 85.2% 0.94 (0.91–0.97), 85.9% 1.00 (0.77–1.00), 0.0% 1.00 (0.89–1.00), 0.0% 127.57 (8.17–1992.19), 48.9% 308.91 (15.84–6023.74), 56.0%
Linear + convex probe 820/8 0.96 (0.94–0.97), 34.1% 0.90 (0.88–0.92), 86.6% 0.86 (0.79–0.92), 88.7% 1.00 (0.97–1.00), 0.0% 176.12 (21.46–1445.75), 78.7% 260.70 (68.90–986.34), 21.9%

CI = confidence interval, CXR = chest radiography, DOR = diagnostic odds ratio, LUS = lung ultrasound, n = patient number, N = study number.