Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;7:577460. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.577460

TABLE 2.

Relationship between clinical features and YTHDF2 expression in LIHC patients (logistic regression).

Clinical characteristics TCGA-LIHC
ICGC-LIRI-JP
Total (N) OR (95%CI) p-value Total (N) OR (95%CI) p-value
Age (continuous) 370 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.23 232 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.68
Gender (female vs. male) 371 0.88 (0.57–1.36) 0.56 231 2.38 (1.31–4.43) 0.01
Grade (poor vs. well) 365 1.66 (1.09–2.57) 0.03 NA
T classification (T3-T4 vs. T1) 274 2.51 (1.51–4.22) 0.01 NA
M classification (M1 vs. M0) 270 0.33 (0.02–2.60) 0.34 NA
Stage (II vs. I) 257 2.16 (1.28–3.67) 0.00 142 1 (0.47–2.14) 1
Stage (III–IV vs. I) 261 2.56 (1.52–4.35) 0.00 126 1.26 (0.86–1.88) 0.24
Stage (IV vs. I) NA 55 1.50 (1.03–2.27) 0.04
Stage (III + IV vs. I + II) 261 1.26 (0.86–1.88) 0.24 232 1.67 (0.98–2.85) 0.06

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Bold values indicate p < 0.05. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.