Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 9;4(4):848–859. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.021

Table I.

Baseline characteristics and intraoperative operative findings of both treatment groups

Variable Group 1 (abduction brace) (n = 21) Group 2 (arm pouch) (n = 21) P value
Age, mean ± SD (range), yr 55.8 ± 7.8 (40-68) 55.5 ± 10.5 (42-70) .93
Sex, n
 Male 13 9 .35
 Female 8 12
Side, n
 Right 17 16 .7
 Left 4 5
Etiology of tear, n
 Traumatic 12 12 >.999
 Degenerative 9 9
Tendons torn, n
 Supraspinatus 7 7 .93
 Supraspinatus and partial infraspinatus 6 7
 Supraspinatus and infraspinatus 8 7
Shape of tear, n
 Crescent 14 11 .63
 L 4 6
 U 3 4
Size of posterosuperior cuff tear: Cofield grade 1/2/3/4, n 3/7/5/6 1/9/6/5 .69
Condition of supraspinatus, n
 Atrophy: stage 1/2/3 17/4/0 16/5/0 .72
 Fatty degeneration: stage 0/1/2/3/4 8/10/3/0/0 9/8/4/0/0 .84
Condition of infraspinatus, n
 Atrophy: stage 1/2/3 18/3/0 15/6/0 .45
 Fatty degeneration: stage 0/1/2/3/4 9/9/3/0/0 10/7/4/0/0 .77
Subscapularis tear, n 9 11
Type of acromion, n
 Type II 15 11 .15
 Type II with spur 6 7
Biceps tenotomy, n 13 13
Footprint advancement, n 2 3
Delamination in infraspinatus, n 5 3
Delamination in supraspinatus, n 0 2
Footprint microfracture, n 16 15
Type of repair, n
 Single row 11 7 .35
 DRSB 10 14
Diabetes mellitus, n 6 4
Preoperative CM score, mean (SD) 32.43 (5.22) 30.25 (5.46) .12
Preoperative VAS score, mean (SD) 8.27 (1.22) 8.15 (1.21) .8
Smoking, n 4 3

SD, standard deviation; DRSB, double-row suture bridge; CM, Constant-Murley; VAS, visual analog scale.