Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;11:591626. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.591626

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics and periodontal condition according to the presence of placental infection (PI) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO).

Control Pg + APO+ Pg + APO- UGM + APO+ PI‐ APO+
n = 17 n = 5 n = 4 n = 5 n = 9
Age mean ± SD 21.29 ± 3.1 24.60 ± 4.6 19.75 ± 1.7 22.20 ± 3 19.33 ± 1.2
Civil status (F%)
Single 5 (29.4) 0 2 (50) 1 (20) 2 (22.2)
Married 1 (5.9) 0 0 0 1 (11.1)
Civil union 11 (64.7) 5 (100) 2 (50) 4 (80) 6 (66.7)
Education (F%)
Elementary 0 0 0 0 2 (22.2)
High school 15 (88.2) 4 (80) 4 (100) 5 (100) 6 (66.7)
Technical 2 (11.8) 1 (20.0) 0 0 1 (11.1)
Periodontitis n (%)
Yes ** 0 (0.0) 3 (60.0) 3 (75.0) 2 (40.0) 0 (0.0)
Clinical signs of placental infection (F%)
Yes 0 (0.0) 2 (40.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
**

p < 0.05 statistically significant difference among groups by Chi square test. Clinical signs of infection included uterine hypersensitivity, fever, maternal tachycardia, fetal tachycardia, and fetid flow.

APO, adverse pregnancy outcome; UGM, urogenital microorganisms; SD, standard deviation; IQR, Interquartile range; Pg+ APO+, P. gingivalis (+) adverse pregnancy outcome (+); Pg+ APO–, P. gingivalis (+) adverse pregnancy outcome –; UGM+ APO+, urogenital microorganisms (+) adverse pregnancy outcome +; PI– APO+, Placental infection (−) adverse pregnancy outcome (+); Control, adverse pregnancy outcome (−) without placental infection.