Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 15;114(12):983–994. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa130

Table 5.

Bivariate analysis using depression, assessed using the PHQ-9 scale, as a continuous outcome variable (N=251)

Variable PHQ-9 score, mean±SD β (95% CI) p-Valuea
Sex
 Male 9.2 ± 5.4 −1.54 (−2.81 to −0.27) 0.02
 Female (reference) 10.7 ± 4.8 1.0
Age (continuous) 10.0 ± 5.2 0.05 (0.01 to 0.08) 0.03
Education
 Illiterate 10.8 ± 5.4 2.32 (1.03 to 3.62) <0.001
 Literate (reference) 8.5 ± 4.4 1.0
Marital status
 Currently married 9.5 ± 5.2 −1.44 (−2.81 to −0.08) 0.04
 Currently not married (reference) 10.9 ± 5.0 1.0
Employment
 Employedb 10.2 ± 5.5 0.90 (−0.71 to 2.42) 0.28
 Not employed (reference) 9.3 ± 3.20 1.0
Relative income
 Very low and low (reference) 11.3 ± 5.3 1.0 <0.001
 Middle and high 8.2 ± 4.4 −3.11 (−4.35 to −1.87)
Acute attack frequency (N=235)
 Every week/2 weeks/month (reference) 10.2 ± 5.1 1.0
 ≥3 months 9.3 ± 5.1 −0.92 (−2.39 to 0.53) 0.21
 Acute attack (continuous) 10.0 ± 5.2 0.01 (−0.24 to 0.26) 0.93
Have you ever received treatment for your leg lymphoedema?
 No (reference) 9.8 ± 5.1 1.0 0.35
 Yes 10.7 ± 5.6 0.84 (−0.93 to 2.61)
Are you currently receiving treatment for, or self-treating your leg(s)?
 No (reference) 10.0 ± 5.1 1.0 0.82
 Yes 9.7 ± 5.9 −0.27 (−2.59 to 2.05)
Hazardous drinking habit (FAST)
 No (reference) 9.7 ± 4.9 1.0 0.38
 Yes 10.3 ± 5.5 0.60 (−0.74 to 1.93)
Social support (based on Oslo-3)
 Poor (reference) 5.9 ± 5.2 1.0
 Moderate 9.0 ± 4.9 −1.76 (−3.17 to −0.35) 0.01
 Strong 10.8 ± 3.5 −4.85 (−7.29 to −2.41) <0.001
Disability assessment based on WHODAS (continuous) 11.8 ± 5.1 0.31 (0.25 to 0.37) <0.001
DLQI (continuous) 10.0 ± 5.2 −0.04 (−0.17 to 0.09) 0.52
a

Linear regression was used to examine the association between explanatory variables and depression measured by the PHQ-9. Explanatory variables with an association of p<0.2 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate linear regression model.

b

Salaried, self-employed and farming.