Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 15;114(12):983–994. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa130

Table 7.

Bivariate analysis using QOL, assessed using the DLQI as a continuous outcome variable (N=251)

Variables DLQI, mean ± SD β (95% CI) p-Valuea
Sex
 Male 12.4 ± 5.3 1.24 (−0.02 to 2.49) 0.05
 Female (reference) 11.2 ± 4.8 1.0
Age (continuous) 11.8 ± 5.1 −0.006 (−0.05 to 0.04) 0.76
Education
 Illiterate 11.3 ± 4.9 −1.17 (−2.47 to 0.12) 0.08
 Literate (reference) 12.5 ± 5.4 1.0
Marital status
 Currently married 11.8 ± 5.2 0.06 (−1.29 to 1.41) 0.93
 Currently not married (reference) 11.7 ± 4.8 1.0
Employment
 Employedb 11.9 ± 5.1 0.82 (−0.72 to 2.37) 0.24
 Not employed (reference) 11.1 ± 5.0 1.0
Relative income
 Very low and low (reference) 11.8 ± 4.9 1.0
 Middle and high 11.6 ± 5.3 −0.22 (−1.50 to 1.06) 0.74
Acute attack frequency (N=235)
 Every week/2 weeks/month (reference) 11.8 ± 5.1 1.0
 ≥3 months 11.8 ± 4.9 −0.02 (−1.45 to 1.42) 0.98
 Acute attack (continuous) 11.8 ± 5.1 0.07 (−0.19 to 0.31) 0.61
Have you ever received treatment for your leg lymphoedema?
 No (reference) 11.9 ± 5.0 1.0
 Yes 11.0 ± 5.4 −0.94 (−2.68 to 0.80) 0.29
Are you currently receiving treatment for, or self-treating your leg(s)?
 No (reference) 12.0 ± 5.1 1.0
 Yes 9.2 ± 4.2 −2.74 (−4.99 to −0.48) 0.02
Hazardous drinking habit (FAST)
 No (reference) 11.3 ± 5.2 1.0
 Yes 12.5 ± 4.8 1.21(−0.09 to 2.51) 0.07
Social support (based on Oslo-3)
 Poor (reference) 12.4 ± 4.7 1.0
 Moderate 10.5 ± 5.2 −1.93 (−3.35 to −0.52) 0.008
 Strong 10.7 ± 7.2 −1.67 (−4.13 to 0.78) 0.18
Disability assessment based on WHODAS (continuous) 11.8 ± 5.1 −0.06 (−0.13 to 0.01) 0.11
PHQ-9 (continuous) 11.8 ± 5.1 −0.04 (−0.16 to 0.08) 0.52
a

Linear regression was used to examine the association between explanatory variables and quality of life measured by DLQI. Explanatory variables with an association of p<0.2 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate linear regression model.

b

Salaried, self-employed and farming.