Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;12(12):542–554. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i12.542

Table 2.

Comparison of stricture outcomes in the thirty patients that returned for follow-up


CR (n = 20)
PR + NR (n = 10)
P value
Demographics
Age at AMAT [yr (IQR)] 28 (24-32) 26 (25-47) 0.66
Sex (M) 11 4 0.70
Duration of disease [yr (IQR)] 4 (1-8) 2 (1-4) 0.45
Time between diagnosis and stricture [yr (IQR)] 3 (0-6) 1.5 (0-3) 0.54
Stricture outcome
Single stricture, n (%) 19 (95) 7 (70) 0.10
Multiple strictures, n (%) 1 (5) 3 (30)
Clinical outcome
Clinical response, n (%) 16 (80) 5 (50) 0.12
No clinical response, n (%) 4 (20) 5 (50)
Pathology
CRP [mg/L (IQR)] 4 (3-10) 6 (4-8) 0.71
ESR [mm/h (IQR)] 5 (2-9) 6 (4-11) 0.86
Area of involvement
ICV, n (%) 8 (40) 4 (40)
TI, n (%) 12 (60) 5 (50)
ICV + TI, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (10)
Duration of AMAT for stricture outcome
≤ 12 mo, n (%) 10 (50) 3 (30) 0.44
> 12 mo, n (%) 10 (50) 7 (70)

Clinical outcomes: (1) Clinical response with complete resolution (CR): n = 16 (7, asymptomatic; 9, improved); (2) clinical response with partial resolution (PR) + no resolution (NR): n = 5 (1, asymptomatic; 4, improved); (3) no clinical response with CR: n = 4 (4, no change); and (4) no clinical response with PR + NR: n = 5 (4, no change; 1, worsened). CR: Complete resolution; PR: Partial resolution; NR: No resolution; AMAT: Anti-mycobacterial antibiotic therapy; IQR: Interquartile range; M: Male; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ICV: Ileocecal valve; TI: Terminal ileum.