Table 2. Benefits of Remote-Microphone Technology in Children with ASD and ADHD.
Disorder: Participants | Authors, year | Test measures: results |
---|---|---|
ASD: 10 ASD 10 controls |
Rance et al, 2014 15 |
•
Word recognition in noise
: significant 17 and 10% improvements with FM in ASD and control groups, respectively
• Questionnaires : better ratings with FM on child APHAB and teacher LIFE |
ASD: 26 ASD |
Rance et al, 2017 31 |
•
Word recognition in noise
: significant 21% improvement with RM; performed at expected level for age with RM
• Questionnaires : perceived benefit with RM • Salivary cortisol concentration : decrease in stress levels when using RM |
ASD: 12 ASD |
Schafer et al, 2016 20 |
•
Speech recognition in noise
: significant 4.6 dB improvements in 8 of the 12 children with RM
• Questionnaires : teachers, participants, and parents reported reduced listening difficulty with RM • Auditory working memory and comprehension : 12–13 point improvement in 7 of the 12 children with RM • ANL : accepted 8.6 dB more noise with RM |
ASD: 15 ASD |
Schafer et al, 2019 32 |
•
Speech recognition in noise
: significant 36.3% improvement with RM
• Auditory processing test battery : 6 of the 9 subtests improved after RM use and training • ANL : significantly improved with RM • Spatial processing : significantly improved LiSN-S high-cue threshold in noise after RM use and training • Dichotic testing : significantly improved after RM use and training • Questionnaire : significantly improved LIFE-R after RM use and training |
ASD: 22 ASD |
Schafer et al, 2019 33 |
•
Speech recognition in noise
: improved by 29% with RM
• Educational need : BKB-SIN, LIFE, sensory profile, and difficulty checklist used to document need. All showed need on 1–2 measures |
ASD, ADHD: 7 ASD/ADHD 11 controls |
Schafer et al, 2013 16 |
•
Sentence recognition in noise
: significant 6 dB improvement with FM significantly worse than controls without FM; similar performance with FM
• Examiner-observed classroom behavior : improved on-task behaviors • Teacher CHAPS : improvement with FM |
ASD, ADHD, LD, or SLI: 12 subjects |
Schafer et al, 2014 17 |
•
Sentence recognition in noise
: significant 65–86% improvement with RM
• Listening comprehension in noise : improved significantly with FM • Questionnaire : improved with FM–LIFE-R, CHILD, and parent CHILD |
ADHD/ADD: 31 subjects |
Updike, 2006 19 |
•
Word recognition in noise
: significant 34% improvement with FM
• Teacher questionnaires : improvements in attention and listening skills |
Abbreviations: ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; ANL, acceptable noise level; APHAB, abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; BKB-SIN, Bamford–Kowal–Bench speech-in-noise test; CHAPS, Children's Auditory Performance Scale; CHILD, Children's Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties; FM, frequency modulation system; LIFE-R, Listening Inventory for Education – Revised; LiSN-S, Listening in Spatialized Noise – Sentences Test; LD, language disorders; RM, remote microphone; SLI, specific language impairment.