Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;203(1):13–21. doi: 10.1111/cei.13508

Table 3.

Longitudinal follow‐up of anti‐Ro60low and anti‐Ro60high groups

Anti‐Ro60low (n = 25) Anti‐Ro60high (n = 25) P‐value
Mean follow‐up period (years ± SD) 2·15 ± 1·20 2·68 ± 1·69 0·207
Additional LIB specificities at baseline (mean ± SD) 0·64 ± 1·04 1·08 ± 1·19 0·170
Loss/no change/gain of additional LIB specificities by end of follow‐up (n) 3/21/1 4/14/6 0·307
Additional LIB specificities by end of follow‐up (mean ± SD) 0·52 ± 0·92* 1·24 ± 1·01* 0·011
Decreased/same/increased anti‐Ro60 intensity group by end of follow‐up (n) 4/18/3 8/16/1 0·294
*

P > 0·05 compared to baseline within the same anti‐Ro60 subset.

Bold value represents significant P < 0·05.

SD = standard deviation; LIB = line immunoblot assay.