Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;54(24):15698–15709. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06595

Table 1. Performance of PM2.5 Composition Models over Europea.

    component Cu Fe K Ni S Si V Zn
  inclusion of XY coordinates no. of sites 414 413 414 402 404 400 402 413
Model Building
SLR one-step model r2 0.56 0.55 0.61 0.62 0.79 0.52 0.70 0.48
    model RMSEb 3.3 65.5 64.6 0.9 146.5 59.7 1.7 11.8
  two-step, step1 model r2 0.52 0.53 0.52 0.56 0.80 0.48 0.66 0.47
    model RMSE 3.4 67.4 71.1 1.0 142.2 61.9 1.8 11.9
  two-step, step2 model r2 0.56 0.53 0.60 0.60 0.82 0.50 0.69 0.48
    model RMSE 3.3 67.4 65.0 0.9 135.4 61.1 1.7 11.8
RFc one-step model r2 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.98 0.95 0.97 0.95
    model RMSE 1.1 20.8 16.8 0.3 40.2 19.9 0.5 3.5
  two-step, step1 model r2 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.98 0.94 0.97 0.96
    model RMSE 1.1 20.9 17.4 0.3 41.8 20.3 0.5 3.4
  two-step, step2 model r2 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.99
    model RMSE 0.6 12.4 9.5 0.2 27.0 12.2 0.3 1.8
HOV
SLR one-step HOV r2 0.47 0.48 0.58 0.57 0.76 0.50 0.63 0.41
    HOV RMSE 3.6 70.5 66.4 1.0 156.4 60.8 1.8 12.5
  two-step, step1 HOV r2 0.44 0.46 0.50 0.51 0.76 0.46 0.60 0.42
    HOV RMSE 3.7 71.7 72.6 1.0 154.9 63.4 1.9 12.4
  two-step, step2 HOV r2 0.48 0.48 0.59 0.56 0.79 0.46 0.63 0.41
    HOV RMSE 3.6 70.5 66.1 1.0 147.0 62.9 1.8 12.5
RF one-step HOV r2 0.60 0.60 0.82 0.74 0.91 0.62 0.85 0.68
    HOV RMSE 3.2 61.7 44.1 0.7 97.0 52.9 1.2 9.3
  two-step, step1 HOV r2 0.59 0.59 0.79 0.74 0.90 0.60 0.84 0.68
    HOV RMSE 3.2 62.4 47.4 0.7 102.1 54.2 1.2 9.2
  two-step, step2 HOV r2 0.59 0.61 0.80 0.76 0.90 0.62 0.86 0.71
    HOV RMSE 3.2 61.3 45.8 0.7 99.5 53.1 1.1 8.7
a

SLR = supervised linear regression; RF = random forest; r2 = squared Pearson correlation; RMSE = root-mean-square error; HOV = fivefold hold-out validation.

b

Unit of RMSE: ng/m3.

c

Performance of RF on training set cannot be interpreted.