Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 13;43(1):40–48. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1853570

Table 2.

Logistic regression models of UFR on IDH.

Model HR 95%CI p value
Ultrafiltration (continuous variable, per 1ml/h/kg increase)
 Unadjusted 1.16 1.08–1.26 <.001
 Model 1 1.24 1.12–1.39 <.001
 Model 2 1.20 1.03–1.40 .017
 Model 3 1.20 1.04–1.40 .016
 Model 4 1.22 1.00–1.47 .042
 Model 5 1.65 1.05–2.61 .031
 Model 6 2.37 1.21–4.62 .012

UFR: ultrafiltration rate; IDH: intradialytic-hypotension.

Model 1: adjusted for demographic data (age, sex, and body mass index).

Model 2: adjusted for Model 1 + dialysis information (interdialytic weight gain, residual renal function, dialysis vintage and single-pool Kt/V).

Model 3: adjusted for Model 2 + comorbid conditions (history of primary hypertension, coronary heart disease, and diabetes).

Model 4: adjusted for Model 3 + biochemical data (serum albumin, pre-albumin, creatinine and hemoglobin).

Model 5: adjusted for Model 4 + cardiac conditions (NT- proBNP, left ventricular mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left atrium diameter index).

Model 6: adjusted for Model 5+ predialysis blood pressure (predialysis systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure).