Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;19(3):233–239. doi: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_71_19

Table 2.

(a) Correlation of standardized uptake value on 5-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography and estrogen receptor expression on immunohistochemistry (b) correlation of standardized uptake value on 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography computed tomography and estrogen receptor expression on immunohistochemistry

a. FDG PET CT - ER correlation

Variable SUV tumor SUV I/L LN SUV C/L LN SUV IM LN SUV metastasis Tumor-to- background ratio
Correlation coefficient with ER score (Spearman’s Rho) −0.3808 −0.7853 0.999 −0.3162 0.8721 −0.2117
P 0.1456 0.0003 0.025 0.6838 0.0539 0.4311

b. FES PET CT - ER correlation

Variable SUV tumor SUV I/L LN SUV C/L LN SUV IM LN SUV metastasis Tumor-to- background ratio Visual interpretation grading

Correlation coefficient with ER score (Spearman’s Rho) 0.5305 0.2668 0.404 0.5000 −0.1026 0.6640 0.7737
P 0.0111 0.2845 0.735 0.6667 0.8696 0.0008 0.0000

SUV: Standardized uptake value; I/L LN: Ipsilateral lymph node; C/L LN: Contralateral lymph node; ER: Estrogen receptor; FDG: 5-flurodeoxyglucose; PET: Positron emission tomography; CT: Computed tomography; IM: Internal mammary; FES: 18F-fluoroestradiol